Use of a novel integrated dilator-needle system in cryoballoon procedures: a zero-exchange approach

BACKGROUND: Recently, a novel integrated dilator-needle system (AcQCross Qx, Acutus Medical) was introduced to reduce the number of exchanges for a transseptal access. This system can be used in combination with large bore sheaths. In this pilot study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a zero-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Main Authors: Yap, Sing-Chien, Bhagwandien, Rohit E., Szili-Torok, Tamas
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Springer US 2022
Subjects:
Article
Arctic
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640442/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799029
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01294-x
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND: Recently, a novel integrated dilator-needle system (AcQCross Qx, Acutus Medical) was introduced to reduce the number of exchanges for a transseptal access. This system can be used in combination with large bore sheaths. In this pilot study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a zero-exchange approach with the AcQCross system in cryoballoon procedures. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, we included 40 patients (AcQCross: n = 20; control group: n = 20) who underwent a cryoballoon procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In the AcQCross and control group, patients underwent ablation with POLARx (Boston Scientific) and Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro, Medtronic) in equal numbers (n = 10). In the AcQCross group, the AcQGuide Max sheath (Acutus Medical) was used in all POLARx cases. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the study population were comparable between groups. In the AcQCross group, there was a reduction in procedure time (49.7 ± 9.0 min vs. 59.6 ± 8.1 min, P < 0.001) and time from puncture until balloon delivery (15.5 ± 6.8 min vs. 21.5 ± 7.4 min, P = 0.01) in comparison with the control group. The balloon in body time, fluoroscopy time, number of cryoapplications, and biophysical parameters were similar between groups. There was one temporary phrenic nerve injury in the AcQCross group. Importantly, no signs of air embolism were noted with the AcQGuide Max sheath. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the novel AcQCross system improves procedural efficacy in cryoballoon procedures by reducing the number of exchanges.

Similar Items