Analysis of emissions and residue from methods to improve efficiency of at-sea, in situ oil spill burns

The combustion efficiency of simulated at-sea surface oil burns (in situ burns) was determined in a 63 m(3) tank while testing varied boom configurations and air-assist nozzles in the presence and absence of waves. Combustion efficiencies of Alaska North Slope oil based on unburned carbon in the plu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Pollution Bulletin
Main Authors: Aurell, Johanna, Holder, Amara, Gullett, Brian, Lamie, Nathan, Arsava, Kemal, Conmy, Robyn, Sundaravadivelu, Devi, Mitchell, William, Stone, Karen
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643349/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34653886
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113016
Description
Summary:The combustion efficiency of simulated at-sea surface oil burns (in situ burns) was determined in a 63 m(3) tank while testing varied boom configurations and air-assist nozzles in the presence and absence of waves. Combustion efficiencies of Alaska North Slope oil based on unburned carbon in the plume emissions ranged from 85% to 93% while values based on oil mass loss ranged from 89% to 99%. A four-fold variation in PM(2.5) emission factors was observed from the test conditions. The most effective burns in terms of reduced emissions and post-burn residue concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons were those that had high length to width boom ratios resulting in higher flame front surface area exposure to ambient air. The amount of oil mass lost was not related to any combustion efficiency parameters measured in the plume, representing a potential tradeoff between unburnt oil and air pollution.