Age determination of sediment core PG2208

• Main Authors: Biskaborn, Boris K, Nazarova, Larisa B, Kröger, Tim, Pestryakova, Luidmila A, Syrykh, Ludmila S, Pfalz, Gregor, Herzschuh, Ulrike, Diekmann, Bernhard
• Format: Dataset
• Language: English
• Published: PANGAEA 2022
• Subjects: Age; 14C AMS; dated; dated material; dated standard error; AWI_Envi; AWI Arctic Land Expedition; COMPCORE; Composite Core; DEPTH; sediment/rock; diatoms; Laboratory; Laboratory code/label; Lake Bolshoe Toko; Yakutia; Russia; Lake sediment core; lake sediment proxies; Paleo Modelling; PalMod; PG2208; Polar Terrestrial Environmental Systems @ AWI; Pretreatment; Reservoir effect/correction; error; RU-Land_2013_Yakutia; Sample mass; Sample thickness; Siberia; Siberian Arctic; Yakutia2013; Arctic
• Online Access: https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.942072; https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.942072

To gain a composite core record for core PG2208 (Figure 1) we used XRF data, i.e., Sr, to correlate overlapping parts of retrieved sections resulting in 367 cm in total. For dating we scanned the sediment core for macro fossils and retrieved bulk sediment samples at depths without any reliable macro remains. A prior attempt to date samples at the Poznan radiocarbon laboratory resulted in a large deviation between humic acid fraction (soluble in NaOH) and the humin fraction (residual, i.e., alkali-insoluble fraction). Therefore, we kept only the Poznan date of the single macro fossil (terrestrial wood remain) that was present and analyzed with standard (reliable) dating routines. For creating a reliable model, we dated another set of bulk sediment samples at MICADAS radiocarbon laboratory at AWI using an acid treatment method outlined in Vyse et al. (2020). To estimate a reservoir (old carbon) effect we dated an undisturbed surface sample PG2119 that was 1.6 km SW of PG2208.