CaFFe (CAlving Fronts and where to Find thEm: a benchmark dataset and methodology for automatic glacier calving front extraction from sar imagery)

The temporal variability in calving front positions of marine-terminating glaciers permits inference on the frontal ablation. Frontal ablation, the sum of the calving rate and the melt rate at the terminus, significantly contributes to the mass balance of glaciers. Therefore, the glacier area has be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gourmelon, Nora, Seehaus, Thorsten, Braun, Matthias Holger, Maier, Andreas, Christlein, Vincent
Format: Dataset
Language:English
Published: PANGAEA 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.940950
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.940950
Description
Summary:The temporal variability in calving front positions of marine-terminating glaciers permits inference on the frontal ablation. Frontal ablation, the sum of the calving rate and the melt rate at the terminus, significantly contributes to the mass balance of glaciers. Therefore, the glacier area has been declared as an Essential Climate Variable product by the World Meteorological Organization. The presented dataset provides the necessary information for training deep learning techniques to automate the process of calving front delineation. The dataset includes Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images of seven glaciers distributed around the globe. Five of them are located in Antarctica: Crane, Dinsmoore-Bombardier-Edgeworth, Mapple, Jorum and the Sjörgen-Inlet Glacier. The remaining glaciers are the Jakobshavn Isbrae Glacier in Greenland and the Columbia Glacier in Alaska. Several images were taken for each glacier, forming a time series. The time series lie in the time span between 1995 and 2020. The images have different spatial resolutions, as they were captured by different satellites. The satellites used are Sentinel-1, TerraSAR-X, TanDEM-X, ENVISAT, European Remote Sensing Satellite 1&2, ALOS PALSAR, and RADARSAT-1. Along with the SAR images, two types of labels are provided so that deep learning techniques can be trained in a supervised manner. One label provides the position of the calving front. The other label shows the position of different landscape regions comprising glacier, rock outcrop, ocean including ice-melange, and an area where no information is available consisting of SAR shadows, layover regions, and areas outside the swath. The two labels allow different approaches to calving front delineation, as the calving front can be extracted from landscape region predictions during post-processing. As additional information for post-processing, the dataset includes bounding boxes for the dynamic calving front for each image. This bounding box excludes nearly static calving fronts also visible in the ...