Stable Methane Isotopologues From Northern Lakes Suggest That Ebullition Is Dominated by Sub-Lake Scale Processes
Stable isotopes have emerged as popular study targets when investigating emission of methane (CH 4 ) from lakes. Yet little is known on how isotopic patterns conform to variations in emission magnitudes—a highly relevant question. Here, we present a large multiyear data set on stable isotopes of CH...
| Published in: | Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1850841 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1850841 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jg005601 |
| Summary: | Stable isotopes have emerged as popular study targets when investigating emission of methane (CH 4 ) from lakes. Yet little is known on how isotopic patterns conform to variations in emission magnitudes—a highly relevant question. Here, we present a large multiyear data set on stable isotopes of CH 4 ebullition (bubbling) from three small adjacent subarctic lakes. The δ 13C-CH 4 and δD-CH 4 range from -78.4‰ to -53.1‰ and from -369.8‰ to -218.8‰, respectively, and vary greatly among the lakes. The signatures suggest dominant hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, particularly in the deep zones, but there are also signals of seemingly acetoclastic production in some high fluxing shallow areas, possibly fueled by in situ vegetation, but in-sediment anaerobic CH 4 oxidation cannot be ruled out as an alternative cause. The observed patterns, however, are not consistent across the lakes. Neither do they correspond to the spatiotemporal variations in the measured bubble CH 4 fluxes. Patterns of acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic production plus oxidation demonstrate that gains and losses of sediment CH 4 are dominated by sub-lake scale processes. The δD-CH 4 in the bubbles was significantly different depending on measurement month, likely due to evaporation effects. Overall, on a larger scale, our isotopic data, combined with those from other lakes, show a significant difference in bubble δD-CH 4 between postglacial and thermokarst lakes, an important result for emission inventories. Although this characteristic theoretically assists in source partitioning studies, most hypothetical future shifts in δD-CH 4 due to high-latitude lake area or production pathway are too small to lead to atmospheric changes detectable with current technology. |
|---|