Characterizing Pore-Scale Geochemical Alterations in Eagle Ford and Barnett Shale from Exposure to Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid and CO 2 /H 2 O
As demand increases for an affordable energy source that is tied to an environmental obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water usage, there is a growing consideration in shale production utilizing processes such as 1) enhancing hydrocarbon recovery via carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) flooding,...
| Published in: | Energy & Fuels |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1843027 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1843027 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02496 |
| Summary: | As demand increases for an affordable energy source that is tied to an environmental obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water usage, there is a growing consideration in shale production utilizing processes such as 1) enhancing hydrocarbon recovery via carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) flooding, 2) using CO 2 as a fracturing agent to minimize water use, and 3) storing CO 2 in depleted shale formations to mitigate emissions to the atmosphere. Understanding the geochemical reactions and alterations that occur as shale is exposed to fluids and CO 2 is necessary to develop and optimize each of these processes for field applications. While the majority of shale formations are stimulated using traditional fracturing fluid, some may be fractured using CO 2 or other non-traditional means. We examine the effect fracturing fluid has on shale and how it behaves with secondary exposure to dry CO 2 or CO 2 -saturated water using in situ Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), feature relocation scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and surface area and pore size analysis using volumetric gas sorption. These techniques were performed on Eagle Ford and Barnett shale samples that were exposed to fracturing fluid and unexposed (as received). Shales that have been exposed to traditional fracturing fluid experienced two reaction fronts. The first reaction front was formed during exposure to the fracturing fluid (pH of ~1.4). A secondary reaction front was formed as a result of CO 2 -saturated fluid exposure in the form of carbonic acid (pH ~5.6). These two different reaction mechanisms drove multiple dissolution and precipitation cycles which altered petrophysical properties of the shale and could lead to a significant impact on flow pathways. FTIR showed that equilibration of carbonate dissolution and precipitation cycles could take as long as 35 days. Samples exposed to fracturing fluid showed significantly less carbonate reactivity compared to those exposed to water. Pore size analysis results indicate exposure to ... |
|---|