Mesh infrastructure for coupled multiprocess geophysical simulations

We have developed a sophisticated mesh infrastructure capability to support large scale multiphysics simulations such as subsurface flow and reactive contaminant transport at storage sites as well as the analysis of the effects of a warming climate on the terrestrial arctic. These simulations involv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Procedia Engineering
Main Authors: Garimella, Rao V., Perkins, William A., Buksas, Mike W., Berndt, Markus, Lipnikov, Konstantin, Coon, Ethan, Moulton, John D., Painter, Scott L.
Language:unknown
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1210029
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1210029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.371
Description
Summary:We have developed a sophisticated mesh infrastructure capability to support large scale multiphysics simulations such as subsurface flow and reactive contaminant transport at storage sites as well as the analysis of the effects of a warming climate on the terrestrial arctic. These simulations involve a wide range of coupled processes including overland flow, subsurface flow, freezing and thawing of ice rich soil, accumulation, redistribution and melting of snow, biogeochemical processes involving plant matter and finally, microtopography evolution due to melting and degradation of ice wedges below the surface. In addition to supporting the usual topological and geometric queries about the mesh, the mesh infrastructure adds capabilities such as identifying columnar structures in the mesh, enabling deforming of the mesh subject to constraints and enabling the simultaneous use of meshes of different dimensionality for subsurface and surface processes. The generic mesh interface is capable of using three different open source mesh frameworks (MSTK, MOAB and STKmesh) under the hood allowing the developers to directly compare them and choose one that is best suited for the application's needs. We demonstrate the results of some simulations using these capabilities as well as present a comparison of the performance of the different mesh frameworks.