Time-lapse CSEM: how important is survey repeatability?
SUMMARY An important concern for time-lapse studies using the controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) method is repeatability of acquisition parameters for the base and monitoring surveys. We consider a challenging case when variations in source and receiver positions, conductivity of seawater, etc...
| Published in: | Geophysical Journal International |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10852/84067 http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-86824 https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa452 |
| Summary: | SUMMARY An important concern for time-lapse studies using the controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) method is repeatability of acquisition parameters for the base and monitoring surveys. We consider a challenging case when variations in source and receiver positions, conductivity of seawater, etc. will lead to differences in the recorded EM fields that exceed EM response due to production-induced changes in the reservoir resistivity. We show that even in that case, 4-D response can often be clearly resolved if the base and monitor EM data sets are inverted to produce 3-D resistivity distributions. More precisely, for a synthetic model of the Snøhvit gas field, changes in the inverted resistivity maps caused by such non-repeatability will be at least 10 times smaller than the time-lapse differences in the reservoir resistivity. By contrast, measurement errors and poor knowledge of background resistivity may reduce the resolution of 4-D CSEM to a much stronger degree. Analysis of field CSEM data from the Wisting oil field supports our conclusion about strongly relaxed repeatability requirements when 4-D effects are established by examining inverted resistivity volumes rather than by looking at raw EM data. |
|---|