Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: implementation, utilization, and barriers in clinical practice in Scandinavia

Background and aims Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may optimize biologic and thiopurine therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study aimed to investigate implementation and utilization of TDM in Scandinavia. Methods A web-based questionnaire on the use of TDM was distributed to Scandi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Main Authors: Hammersbøen, Kristin Reine, Jahnsen, Jørgen, Brynskov, Jørn, Molander, Pauliina, Eberhardson, Michael, Davidsdottir, Loà G., Sipponen, Taina, Hjortswang, Henrik, Goll, Guro Løvik, Syversen, Silje Watterdal, Langholz, Ebbe, Jørgensen, Kristin Kaasen, Steenholdt, Casper
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Norway
Iceland
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10852/100251
https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2022.2108684
Description
Summary:Background and aims Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may optimize biologic and thiopurine therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study aimed to investigate implementation and utilization of TDM in Scandinavia. Methods A web-based questionnaire on the use of TDM was distributed to Scandinavian gastroenterologists via the national societies. Results In total, 297 IBD physicians prescribing biologic therapies, equally distributed between community and university hospitals, were included (response rate 42%) (Norway 118 (40%), Denmark 86 (29%), Sweden 50 (17%), Finland 33 (11%), Iceland 10 (3%)). Overall, TDM was applied during biologic therapies by 87%, and for TNF-inhibitors >90%. Among the users, reactive and proactive TDM were utilized by 90% and 63%, respectively. Danish physicians were significantly less inclined to use TDM compared to other Scandinavian countries; (58% vs 98%); OR 0.03 [0.01–0.09], p < 0.001). Reactive TDM was commonly applied at primary (74%) and secondary (99%) treatment failure. Proactive TDM was used by 80% during maintenance therapy and 56% during induction and more commonly utilized in Norway (p < 0.001), and by physicians managing >10 IBD patients/week (p = 0.005). TDM scenarios were interpreted in accord with available evidence but with discrepancies for proactive TDM. The main barriers to TDM were lack of guidelines (51%) and time lag between sampling and results (49%). TDM of thiopurines was routinely used by 87%. Conclusion TDM of biologic and thiopurine therapies has been broadly implemented into clinical practice in Scandinavia. However, physicians call for TDM guidelines detailing indications and interpretations of test results along with improved test response times.

Similar Items