Trying to choose the less bad route: Individual migratory behaviour of Atlantic salmon smolts (Salmo salar L.) approaching a bifurcation between a hydropower station and a navigation canal

peer reviewed Contrary to small- and medium-sized rivers, little attention has been paid to the downstream migration of Atlantic salmon smolts in large-sized rivers and the size-related impact of hydropower stations. From 2014 to 2016, we investigated the downstream migration of n=72 acoustic-tagged...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Engineering
Main Authors: Renardy, Séverine, Takriet, Abderrahmane, Benitez, Jean-Philippe, Dierckx, Arnaud, Bayens, Raf, Coeck, Johan, Pauwels, Ine, Mouton, Ans, Archambeau, Pierre, Dewals, Benjamin, Pirotton, Michel, Erpicum, Sébastien, Ovidio, Michaël
Other Authors: FOCUS - Freshwater and OCeanic science Unit of reSearch - ULiège, AFFISH-RC - Applied and Fundamental FISH Research Center - ULiège
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/261902
https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/261902/1/Renardy%20et%20al%202021_EcologicalEngineering_Smolts.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106304
Description
Summary:peer reviewed Contrary to small- and medium-sized rivers, little attention has been paid to the downstream migration of Atlantic salmon smolts in large-sized rivers and the size-related impact of hydropower stations. From 2014 to 2016, we investigated the downstream migration of n=72 acoustic-tagged smolts in the Meuse river at a bifurcation zone between a hydropower station equipped with three Kaplan turbines and a navigation canal. A hydrodynamic model that solves the depth-integrated shallow water equations on a Cartesian grid using a finite volume technique was used to infer the influence of water discharge and flow velocity on the smolts’ behaviour upstream of the hydroelectric complex. Of the migrating smolts, 41.5 % performed back and forth movements before approaching the complex for the first time, sometimes over long distances and at a slow pace, leading to significant delays (3‒298 h). Beyond about 250 m3 s-1, the water flow direction changes towards the hydropower station with a gradual acceleration. A median water discharge of 161 m3 s-1 and associated median flow velocity of 0.14 m s-1 tended to favour a more direct and downstream movement towards the hydropower station. On the other hand, the navigation canal was mainly approached at low water discharge (median 132 m3 s-1), due to a higher flow velocity (median 0.11 m s-1) at the entrance. Of the released smolts, only 38.6 % passed through the complex, of which 36.4 % migrated by the navigation canal and 63.6 % by the hydropower station, with a median research time of 04:44. Among all the released individuals, the escapement rate at the end of the study site was 2.9 % by the canal and 8.3 % by the Meuse river. This site, which offers two non-optimal, unattractive and unsafe migration routes, turns out to be problematic for successful downstream smolt migration.