Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study

• Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
• Main Authors: Guðmundsson, Haukur Týr, Hansen, Karen E., Halldórsson, Bjarni, Ludviksson, Bjorn, Gudbjornsson, Bjorn
• Other Authors: Læknadeild (HÍ), Faculty of Medicine (UI), Heilbrigðisvísindasvið (HÍ), School of Health Sciences (UI), School of Science and Engineering (RU), Tækni- og verkfræðideild (HR), Háskóli Íslands, University of Iceland, Háskólinn í Reykjavík, Reykjavik University
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2019
• Subjects: Clinical decision support system (CDSS); Clinical guidelines; Fracture risk; Osteoporosis; Treatment recommendations; Beinþynning; Upplýsingakerfi; Sjúkdómsgreining; Áhættuþættir; Iceland
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1813; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4

Publisher's version (útgefin grein) Background: Although osteoporosis is an easily diagnosed and treatable condition, many individuals remain untreated. Clinical decision support systems might increase appropriate treatment of osteoporosis. We designed the Osteoporosis Advisor (OPAD), a computerized tool to support physicians managing osteoporosis at the point-of-care. The present study compares the treatment recommendations provided by OPAD, an expert physician and the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 259 patients attending the outpatient osteoporosis clinic at the University Hospital in Iceland. We entered each patient's data into the OPAD and recorded the OPAD diagnostic comments, 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture and treatment options. We compared OPAD recommendations to those given by the osteoporosis specialist, and to those of the NOGG. Results: Risk estimates made by OPAD were highly correlated with those from FRAX (r = 0.99, 95% CI 0.99, 1.00 without femoral neck BMD; r = 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97, 0.99 with femoral neck BMD. Reassurance was recommended by the expert, NOGG and the OPAD in 68, 63 and 52% of cases, respectively. Likewise, intervention was recommended by the expert, NOGG, and the OPAD in 32, 37 and 48% of cases, respectively. The OPAD demonstrated moderate agreement with the physician (kappa 0.51, 95% CI 0.41, 0.61) and even higher agreement with NOGG (kappa 0.69, 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Conclusion: Primary care physicians can use the OPAD to assess and treat patients' skeletal health. Recommendations given by OPAD are consistent with expert opinion and existing guidelines. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Peer Reviewed