Legalizing altruistic surrogacy in response to evasive travel? An Icelandic proposal
Surrogate motherhood has been prohibited by Icelandic law since 1996, but in recent years, Icelandic couples have soughttransnational surrogacy in India and the United States despite uncertainties about legal parental status as they return to Iceland withinfants born to surrogate mothers. This refle...
| Published in: | Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Other Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier BV
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1383 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.12.003 |
| Summary: | Surrogate motherhood has been prohibited by Icelandic law since 1996, but in recent years, Icelandic couples have soughttransnational surrogacy in India and the United States despite uncertainties about legal parental status as they return to Iceland withinfants born to surrogate mothers. This reflects global trends of increased reproductive tourism, which forces restrictive regimes not onlyto make decisions concerning the citizenship and parentage of children born to surrogate mothers abroad, but also to confront difficultmoral issues concerning surrogacy, global justice, human rights and exploitation. In March 2015, a legislative proposal permittingaltruistic surrogacy, subject to strict regulation and oversight, and prohibiting the solicitation of commercial surrogacy abroad, waspresented in the Icelandic Parliament. The proposal aims to protect the interest of the child first, respect the autonomy of the surrogatesecond, and accommodate the intended parents’wishes third. After a brief overview of the development of the surrogacy issue inIceland, this article describes the main features of this legislative proposal and evaluates it from an ethical and global justice perspective.It concludes that the proposed legislation is a response to problems generated by cross-border surrogacy in the context of evolving publicattitudes toward the issue, and constitutes a valid attempt to reduce the moral hazards of surrogacy consistent with insights from currentbioethical literature. Although the proposed legislation arguably represents an improvement over the current ban, however, difficultproblems concerning evasive travel and global injustice are likely to persist until effective international coordination is achieved. This research was supported by the Brocher foundation, and by University of Akureyri through a sabbatical leave. Peer reviewed |
|---|