探討生態系環境因素與生物特徵連結策略對學生生態系概念學習之影響

• Main Authors: 楊誠晅, Yang, Cheng-Hsuan
• Other Authors: 顏妙璇, Yen, Miao-Hsuan
• Format: Other/Unknown Material
• Language: Chinese
• Published: 2022
• Subjects: 生物特徵; 生態系環境因素; 推理; Biological features; Ecological factor; Reasoning; Tundra
• Online Access: http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/116993; https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12235/116993; https://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/thesis/detail/9a45531fd402c404094e653bdb19fa6d/

本研究探討連結生態系環境因素與生物特徵對大學以上學生學習生態系相 關內容之影響。研究過程中，受試者需進行先備知識檢測、連結任務、引導教學與分類任務，並在過程中不斷思考生物特徵與生態系環境因素之間的連結。30 位受試者在先備知識檢測與特徵紀錄筆記中推理生物特徵與生態系環境因素之間的連結並發想沙漠、雨林、凍原生態系的生物特徵;在分類任務中，提供受試 者一對生物的特徵，希望受試者以特徵與生態系環境因素連結作為分類依據，將生物分類至適合生存的生態系。資料分析中以受試者「對生物特徵與生態系環境 因素連結的掌握程度」作為主軸，對先備知識檢測、分類任務與特徵紀錄筆記進行評分，將受試者的回答先依照有無推理做區分，再依照推理是否合理給予 3 分或 2 分;若受試者僅能依照印象或先備知識說出生物特徵而無推理則得 1 分; 無回答或回答錯誤則得 0 分。研究結果顯示，整體受試者在先備知識檢測時的回答多集中於無推理的 1 分，而經過連結任務與引導教學後，分類任務回答與統整筆記得分分佈則集中於 3 分。顯示經過本研究設計的教學後，多數受試者都能從只能說出生物特徵無法 推理連結，進步到不僅能說出特徵也能成功推理出特徵與生態系環境因素間的連 結。另外分析分類任務中，錯誤分類生態系的受試者，這些受試者雖然能夠推理出合理的特徵與生態系環境因素連結，但因為生物相關知識不足以及無法考慮整 體生態系對同一生物不同特徵的影響，因此造成受試者即使推理出合理連結，依舊錯誤分類生態系。 This study explored the strategy of connecting ecological factors with biological features and its influence on students’ conceptual learning about ecosystems. During the experiment, students were required to constantly thinking about the connection between biological features and ecological factors in prior knowledge test, connecting tasks, guiding teaching and classifying tasks. In the prior knowledge test and feature notes, 30 students reasoned about the connection between biological features and ecological factors for creatures in desert, rainforest, and tundra. In the classifying task, students were provided with 6 pairs of creatures and their biological features and were asked to classify each pair of creatures into correct ecosystems based on the connection between biological features and ecological factors. Students’ response in prior knowledge test, connecting task, and classifying tasks were scored according to the “ability of reasoning about connection between biological features and ecological factors.” The responses were first distinguished according to whether there is reasoning, and then 3 or 2 points are given according to whether the reasoning is reasonable; if the student can only describe the features according to the impressions or prior knowledge without reasoning, it will be scored 1 point; finally, 0 points were given for no response or wrong responses.The results of ...