The marine δ18O record overestimates continental ice volume during Marine Isotope Stage 3

There is disagreement in the Quaternary research community in how much of the marine δ18O signal is driven by change in ice volume. Here, we examine this topic by bringing together empirical and modelling work for Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS 3; 57 ka to 29 ka), a time when the marine δ18O record ind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global and Planetary Change
Main Authors: Dalton, April S., Pico, Tamara, Gowan, Evan J., Clague, John J., Forman, Steven L., McMartin, Isabelle, Sarala, Pertti, Helmens, Karin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Enheten för paleobiologi 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-4978
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103814
Description
Summary:There is disagreement in the Quaternary research community in how much of the marine δ18O signal is driven by change in ice volume. Here, we examine this topic by bringing together empirical and modelling work for Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS 3; 57 ka to 29 ka), a time when the marine δ18O record indicates moderate continental glaciation and a global mean sea level between −60 m and −90 m. We compile and interpret geological data dating to MIS 3 to constrain the extent of major Northern Hemisphere ice sheets (Eurasian, Laurentide, Cordilleran). Many key data, especially published in the past ~15 years, argue for an ice-free core of the formerly glaciated regions that is inconsistent with inferences from the marine δ18O record. We compile results from prior studies of glacial isostatic adjustment to show the volume of ice inferred from the marine δ18O record is unable to fit within the plausible footprint of Northern Hemisphere ice sheets during MIS 3. Instead, a global mean sea level between −30 m and − 50 m is inferred from geological constraints and glacial isostatic modelling. Furthermore, limited North American ice volumes during MIS 3 are consistent with most sea-level bounds through that interval. We can find no concrete evidence of large-scale glaciation during MIS 3 that could account for the missing ~30 m of sea-level equivalent during that time, which suggests that changes in the marine δ18O record are driven by other variables, including water temperature. This work urges caution regarding the reliance of the marine δ18O record as a de facto indicator of continental ice when few geological constraints are available, which underpins many Quaternary studies. T.P. acknowledges funding from an NSF-EAR Postdoctoral Fellowship and UC President's Postdoc Program Fellowship. Field work innorthern Hudson Bay (Nunavut) is a contribution to Natural Resources Canada Geomapping for Energy and Minerals (GEM) Program (NRCancomribution number 20210064). E.J .G. was funded by Impuls- und Vernetzungsfonds, ...