Raptors, racing pigeons and perceptions of attacks

• Published in: European Journal of Wildlife Research
• Main Authors: Kettel, EF, Yarnell, RW, Quinn, JL, Gentle, LK
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Springer (part of Springer Nature) 2021
• Subjects: Falco peregrinus
• Online Access: http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/43603/; http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/43603/1/1453964_Yarnell.pdf; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01513-2

Raptors are often the cause of human-wildlife conflict because they may predate economically valuable species, and it is the perceived extent of predation that may augment conflict between raptors and people who keep and race pigeons. This study uses data obtained through questionnaires and an online raptor-attack reporting feature to investigate the frequency of racing pigeon losses and the perceptions of pigeon fanciers. Responses suggest that those who kept more pigeons and entered more races lost a higher proportion of pigeons. Losses were also influenced by the predatory species: sparrowhawks (Accipter nisus) were more likely to attack pigeons at lofts, whilst peregrines (Falco peregrinus) were more likely to attack pigeons during training, with patterns linked to the raptors' breeding seasons. Pigeon fanciers were almost unanimous in their perception that raptors threaten the future of the hobby. Previous studies show that only a small proportion of racing pigeons are likely to be lost to raptors, yet pigeon fanciers believe that raptors are the main cause of losses, highlighting a possible mismatch between the perceived and actual causes of loss. This misconception may be a main source of this human-raptor conflict, so educating pigeon fanciers about the true impact of raptors could help to alleviate the issue. A shift in the beginning of the pigeon racing season by one month, and careful sighting of pigeon lofts in gardens, are also recommended in order to reduce raptor attacks.