18,19世紀におけるアムール川下流域の住民の交易活動

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the trade activity of the ancestors of the indigenous peoples of the Lower Amur Basin in the 18th and 19th centuries and to reexamine the discourse of their society and culture in classical ethnography. They have usually been described as hunters, fishermen, o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. , Сасаки, Sasaki, Shiro, 佐々木, 史郎, ササキ, シロウ
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:Japanese
Published: 国立民族学博物館 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:https://minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4139/files/KH_022_4_001.pdf
Description
Summary:The purpose of this paper is to clarify the trade activity of the ancestors of the indigenous peoples of the Lower Amur Basin in the 18th and 19th centuries and to reexamine the discourse of their society and culture in classical ethnography. They have usually been described as hunters, fishermen, or collectors of wild plants in much ethnography since the late 19th century, and the primitiveness of their foraging life style, fishing and hunting techniques, and social structure has often been underlined by anthropologists, ethnologists, and historians. The policies of the former Soviet Union to rescue them from the poverty caused by their primitive level of production was based on such discourse of the scholars. However, were they really poor? Were their life style, culture, and society really primitive? Historical documents written by Japanese explorers and investigators in the 18th and 19th centuries, Mogami Tokunai, Mamiya Rinzo, Nakamura Koichiro, and so on, indicate that they had a highly sophisticated culture and a complex society. For example, modern ethnologists often underline the fact that the peoples of the Lower Amur were ichthyophagi, and that a piece of dried fish occupied the same position as a piece of bread in European meals. On the contrary, Japanese investigators said that their staple food was a cup of boiled millet, usually put in a small bowl of china or lacquer ware. Though ethnologists often described fish skin coats in detail, most of their clothes were made of cotton, and their ritual costumes were even made of silk. It is a fact that millet, cotton, silk, china, and lacquer ware were not their original products, but Chinese or Japanese ones which they obtained through trade with Chinese and Japanese. It is also a fact, however, that these things occupied an important position in their cultural complex. It is an injustice for researchers not to properly evaluate them and not to pay any attention to the trade activity. The trade activity of the ancestors of the peoples of the Lower Amur ...