Retrospective growth analysis of the dwarf shrub Cassiope tetragona allows local estimation of vascular plant productivity in high arctic Svalbard
Question: Vascular plant productivity of arctic tundra has often been viewed as varying little between years and thus being largely insensitive to the high inter-annual variation in summer weather conditions. Yet, remote-sensing data and retrospective growth analyses of the circumpolar dwarf shrub,...
| Published in: | Journal of Vegetation Science |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2573599 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12679 |
| Summary: | Question: Vascular plant productivity of arctic tundra has often been viewed as varying little between years and thus being largely insensitive to the high inter-annual variation in summer weather conditions. Yet, remote-sensing data and retrospective growth analyses of the circumpolar dwarf shrub, Cassiope tetragona, commonly show considerable between-year variability in plant growth in response to variation in summer temperature. Given that both Cassiope growth and vascular plant biomass production share a common environmental driver, summer temperature, we would expect positive co-variation between them. Here we investigate whether this is indeed the case and if so over what spatial scale. Location: Nordenskiöldland, high arctic Svalbard. Methods: We brought dendroecology and plot-based field estimation methodologies together in an empirical study using retrospective analysis of Cassiope growth and annual estimation of above-ground vegetation biomass production to investigate their temporal and spatial co-variation and sensitivity to summer weather conditions. Results: Despite substantial small-scale heterogeneity, we found spatial co-variation in Cassiope growth patterns, which weakened as distance between sampling sites increased from 0 to 25 km. Furthermore, we found a strong positive correlation between annual estimates of above-ground live vascular plant biomass and Cassiope shoot growth over a 12-year period at a local scale. The correlation declined with distance, likely due to increasing differences in local weather conditions. Conclusions: We demonstrate that Cassiope growth can be used as a proxy for above-ground tundra vegetation productivity at the local scale. Our findings suggest that Arctic plant productivity is as sensitive to between-year variation in summer temperature as the well-established growth response of Cassiope. This challenges the view that tundra plant productivity varies little between years and provides a mechanistic understanding that helps reconcile field-and satellite-based ... |
|---|