| Summary: | 2009年希臘爆發債信危機至今歐債問題雖有稍加緩解但仍未找到治本之良方。歐債危機顯現歐元區結構性的缺失，並突顯歐洲諸國長年舉債以掩蓋競爭力不足的事實。歐元區的貨幣聯盟是一個不成熟即上路的政策，並不符合「最適貨幣區」的條件。加上無財政與政治聯盟，使得歐元區才成立10年即遭遇重大的挑戰。德國身為歐洲經濟大國，在這場危機中扮演領導者的角色。德國介入歐債危機必須支付龐大的金額，為何不顧國內人民的反對紓困歐元區其他會員國乃介入歐債危機符合德國國家利益。 本論文之研究方法主要採用文獻分析法與比較分析法，首先檢視歐債危機發生的原因與背景，並以冰島與希臘為例分析兩國發生危機的原因。接著探討冰島與希臘提出因應危機的政策及歐盟所提出的策略。研究途徑以現實主義為立論基礎，分析德國介入危機乃基於國家本位主義的考量，維護歐元的存在有助於其經濟的出口，再加上主導歐債危機更可深化德國在歐洲的政治、經濟影響力。德國因過去兩次世界大戰的負面歷史，使得戰後的外交政策上受到局限，如今的歐債危機正好提供德國重新站上歐洲政治舞台中心的契機。 In year 2009, Greece debt crisis broke out, until now, although the European sovereign debt issue does show signs of relief but the permanent cure is still yet to be found. The European sovereign debt demonstrated the Eurozone’s structural defects and highlighted the fact of European countries’ lack of competitiveness cover up due to their extended debt financing. The European Monetary Union was an immature policy put into practice, and was not fit for the condition of the optimal currency areas. In addition, the non-affiliation of finance and politics has already presented serious challenges to the Eurozone in just ten short years since its establishment. As an economic power in Europe, Germany has been playing a leading role in this crisis; the intervention in the crisis also meant that Germany would need to pay out massive amount. Why the bailouts for other member countries in the Eurozone despite all the domestic objections; the European sovereign debt crisis intervention is in line with the Germany’s national interests. The methods of this study mainly focus on documentary analysis and comparative analysis; first inspect the reasons and backgrounds of the occurrence of European sovereign debt crisis and uses the Iceland and Greece as examples to analyze the reasons behind their crisis. Next explore the policy of Greece and Iceland in response to the crisis and the strategy proposed by the EU. The approach uses realism as the theoretical basis to analyze that Germany’s intervention is actually based on the consideration of nationalism, defending the existence of Eurodollar is helpful to both Germany’s economic export and strengthens its political and economic influences. Germany’s post war diplomatic policies are hampered by the negative histories of two previous world wars, and now the European sovereign debt crisis had provided just the right opportunity for Germany to step up again in the center of European political stages. 第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究動機與目的1 第二節 研究方法與途徑4 第三節 研究假設與架構8 第四節 研究範圍與限制12 第五節 文獻回顧13 第二章 歐債發生的背景及源起19 第一節 歐洲債信發生的原因19 第二節 歐元區結構性問題24 第三節 冰島與希臘危機之分析 33 第三章 歐債危機的發展與因應對策45 第一節 冰島的因應對策45 第二節 希臘的因應對策52 第三節 歐盟的因應對策60 第四章 德國因應危機之政策分析71 第一節 德國介入歐債危機的利益考量71 第二節 德國因應危機的政策78 第三節 歐盟因應歐債政策德法兩國意見85 第四節 德國因應危機政策之國內外反應92 第五章 結論99 第一節 研究發現99 第二節 未來展望101 參考文獻105 一、中文部分105 二、外文部分111
|
|---|