The boundary layer response to recent Arctic sea ice loss and implications for high-latitude climate feedbacks

This study documents and evaluates the boundary layer and energy budget response to record low 2007 sea ice extents in the Community Atmosphere Model version 4 (CAM4) using 1-day observationally constrained forecasts and 10-yr runs with a freely evolving atmosphere. While near-surface temperature an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Climate
Other Authors: Kay, Jennifer (author), Raeder, Kevin (author), Gettelman, Andrew (author), Anderson, Jeffrey (author)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Meteorological Society 2011
Subjects:
CAM
Online Access:http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-001-728
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3651.1
Description
Summary:This study documents and evaluates the boundary layer and energy budget response to record low 2007 sea ice extents in the Community Atmosphere Model version 4 (CAM4) using 1-day observationally constrained forecasts and 10-yr runs with a freely evolving atmosphere. While near-surface temperature and humidity are minimally affected by sea ice loss in July 2007 forecasts, near-surface stability decreases and atmospheric humidity increases aloft over newly open water in September 2007 forecasts. Ubiquitous low cloud increases over the newly ice-free Arctic Ocean are found in both the July 2007 and the September 2007 forecasts. In response to the 2007 sea ice loss, net surface [top of the atmosphere (TOA)] energy budgets change by +19.4 W m⁻ ² (+21.0 W m⁻ ²) and −17.9 W m⁻ ² (+1.4 W m⁻ ²) in the July 2007 and September 2007 forecasts, respectively. While many aspects of the forecasted response to sea ice loss are consistent with physical expectations and available observations, CAM4?s ubiquitous July 2007 cloud increases over newly open water are not. The unrealistic cloud response results from the global application of parameterization designed to diagnose stratus clouds based on lower-tropospheric stability (CLDST). In the Arctic, the well-mixed boundary layer assumption implicit in CLDST is violated. Requiring a well-mixed boundary layer to diagnose stratus clouds improves the CAM4 cloud response to sea ice loss and increases July 2007 surface (TOA) energy budgets over newly open water by +11 W m⁻ ² (+14.9 W m⁻ ²). Of importance to high-latitude climate feedbacks, unrealistic stratus cloud compensation for sea ice loss occurs only when stable and dry atmospheric conditions exist. Therefore, coupled climate projections that use CAM4 will underpredict Arctic sea ice loss only when dry and stable summer conditions occur. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): 08-MAP-117