Estimation of errors in the TOMS total ozone measurement during the Antarctica ozone campaign of August/September 1987

The Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) instrument on the Nimbus-7 satellite provides the primary source of total ozone data for the study of total ozone in the polar regions of the earth. There are two types of instrument related errors: a slowly developing drift in the instrument calibration s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taylor, S., Bhartia, P. K., Krueger, Arlin J., Wellemeyer, C.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19890005139
_version_ 1821518949198594048
author Taylor, S.
Bhartia, P. K.
Krueger, Arlin J.
Wellemeyer, C.
author_facet Taylor, S.
Bhartia, P. K.
Krueger, Arlin J.
Wellemeyer, C.
author_sort Taylor, S.
collection NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
description The Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) instrument on the Nimbus-7 satellite provides the primary source of total ozone data for the study of total ozone in the polar regions of the earth. There are two types of instrument related errors: a slowly developing drift in the instrument calibration since the launch of the instrument in October 1978 and an increase in the measurement noise beginning April, 1984. It is estimated that by October 1987, the accumulated error in the TOMS total ozone measurement due to instrument drift is about 6 m-atm-cm. The sign of the error is such that the TOMS is slightly overpredicting the long-term decrease of the Antarctica ozone. The increase in the measurement noise is more difficult to quantify, affecting some measurements by as much as 10 D.U. and others not at all. A detailed analysis of this error and its potential impact on the studies of total ozone from TOMS will be provided. There are three categories of algorithmic errors: (1) error due the unusual shape of the ozone profile in the ozone hole; (2) error caused by very low atmospheric temperatures in the ozone hole affecting the ozone absorption cross-sections at the TOMS wavelengths; and (3) errors resulting from occasionally thick stratospheric clouds that sometimes reach to 20 km in the ozone hole.
format Other/Unknown Material
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
id ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:19890005139
institution Open Polar
language unknown
op_collection_id ftnasantrs
op_coverage Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available
op_relation Document ID: 19890005139
Accession ID: 89N14510
http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19890005139
op_rights No Copyright
op_source CASI
publishDate 1988
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:19890005139 2025-01-16T19:01:08+00:00 Estimation of errors in the TOMS total ozone measurement during the Antarctica ozone campaign of August/September 1987 Taylor, S. Bhartia, P. K. Krueger, Arlin J. Wellemeyer, C. Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available May 1, 1988 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19890005139 unknown Document ID: 19890005139 Accession ID: 89N14510 http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19890005139 No Copyright CASI ENVIRONMENT POLLUTION Polar Ozone Workshop. Abstracts; p 17-18 1988 ftnasantrs 2015-03-15T05:59:55Z The Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) instrument on the Nimbus-7 satellite provides the primary source of total ozone data for the study of total ozone in the polar regions of the earth. There are two types of instrument related errors: a slowly developing drift in the instrument calibration since the launch of the instrument in October 1978 and an increase in the measurement noise beginning April, 1984. It is estimated that by October 1987, the accumulated error in the TOMS total ozone measurement due to instrument drift is about 6 m-atm-cm. The sign of the error is such that the TOMS is slightly overpredicting the long-term decrease of the Antarctica ozone. The increase in the measurement noise is more difficult to quantify, affecting some measurements by as much as 10 D.U. and others not at all. A detailed analysis of this error and its potential impact on the studies of total ozone from TOMS will be provided. There are three categories of algorithmic errors: (1) error due the unusual shape of the ozone profile in the ozone hole; (2) error caused by very low atmospheric temperatures in the ozone hole affecting the ozone absorption cross-sections at the TOMS wavelengths; and (3) errors resulting from occasionally thick stratospheric clouds that sometimes reach to 20 km in the ozone hole. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctica NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
spellingShingle ENVIRONMENT POLLUTION
Taylor, S.
Bhartia, P. K.
Krueger, Arlin J.
Wellemeyer, C.
Estimation of errors in the TOMS total ozone measurement during the Antarctica ozone campaign of August/September 1987
title Estimation of errors in the TOMS total ozone measurement during the Antarctica ozone campaign of August/September 1987
title_full Estimation of errors in the TOMS total ozone measurement during the Antarctica ozone campaign of August/September 1987
title_fullStr Estimation of errors in the TOMS total ozone measurement during the Antarctica ozone campaign of August/September 1987
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of errors in the TOMS total ozone measurement during the Antarctica ozone campaign of August/September 1987
title_short Estimation of errors in the TOMS total ozone measurement during the Antarctica ozone campaign of August/September 1987
title_sort estimation of errors in the toms total ozone measurement during the antarctica ozone campaign of august/september 1987
topic ENVIRONMENT POLLUTION
topic_facet ENVIRONMENT POLLUTION
url http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19890005139