Neither Mary nor Magdalen : the fallen woman, the dramatic monologue, and the nineteenth-century woman poet

Thesis (M.W.S.)--Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2011. Women's Studies Bibliography: leaves 112-119. This study seeks to expand our understanding of the nineteenth-century fallen woman through an exploration of the ways in which she is represented in a small selection of dramatic poetry wr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin, Nancy Marie, 1984-
Other Authors: Memorial University of Newfoundland. Women's Studies Programme
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://collections.mun.ca/cdm/ref/collection/theses5/id/26905
Description
Summary:Thesis (M.W.S.)--Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2011. Women's Studies Bibliography: leaves 112-119. This study seeks to expand our understanding of the nineteenth-century fallen woman through an exploration of the ways in which she is represented in a small selection of dramatic poetry written by women who were directly involved with fallen women, either through reclamation work, or through social and political writing. The overarching premise of this study is that these female poets-Dora Greenwell (1821-1888), Augusta Webster (1837-1894), and Mathilde Blind (1841-1896)-chose to represent the "fallen" woman in ways that challenged dominant conventions. Their poetry suggests that neither the arguments for reclamation-redemption through religious and domestic teaching-nor those for condemnation are adequate, as both are grounded in discourses that have more basis in myth than in reality. Rather, their "fallen woman" poetry, by focusing on the material conditions of fallen women themselves, illuminates the fallen woman's position and circumstance as complex and contingent and in so doing, challenges the "fallen woman" archetype. Their dramatic monologues, published in 1861, 1870, and 1891 respectively, function collectively in depicting not the voice of the fallen woman, but of fallen women.