_venomous_
Venomous a shouldn't one spelling variant be cited (like _vemynousse_) to support the phonetics of [PT] ?? (at top of citation in original) Putting things down in print really forces the issue. Evidence is slight. We are calling attention to the aberration, and not saying anything about the nor...
| Format: | Manuscript |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://collections.mun.ca/cdm/ref/collection/elrcdne/id/67957 |
| Summary: | Venomous a shouldn't one spelling variant be cited (like _vemynousse_) to support the phonetics of [PT] ?? (at top of citation in original) Putting things down in print really forces the issue. Evidence is slight. We are calling attention to the aberration, and not saying anything about the normal. We could omit phonetics and let ad hoc spelling show the odd form. Or we could follow Bob's sug. B revision RH Used I Not used Not used |
|---|