An examination of the criteria of teacher evaluation as perceived by the school teachers of Newfoundland

This study was conducted to determine the criteria that Newfoundland school teachers felt should be used in evaluating teachers for (a) teacher competence, and (b) promotion to administrative positions. -- The questionnaire consisted of two parts: a personal and school background variable questionna...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hickman, James
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Memorial University of Newfoundland 1975
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.library.mun.ca/7371/
https://research.library.mun.ca/7371/1/Hickman_James.pdf
https://research.library.mun.ca/7371/3/Hickman_James.pdf
Description
Summary:This study was conducted to determine the criteria that Newfoundland school teachers felt should be used in evaluating teachers for (a) teacher competence, and (b) promotion to administrative positions. -- The questionnaire consisted of two parts: a personal and school background variable questionnaire, and two evaluation questionnaires. The latter section of the questionnaire contained identical thirty-item batteries arranged in different sequences. These items were evenly distributed into Mitzel’s three categories of presage, process and product for each evaluative situation. The questionnaire also asked the teachers to indicate whom they felt was in the best position to evaluate their teaching. The questionnaire provided ample space for teachers to include additional criteria which they perceived to be important for each evaluative situation, and space for teachers to add comments on the study itself. The questionnaire was mailed to 300 randomly selected Newfoundland school teachers of which 84.3 per cent responded. -- To analyse the data gathered, frequency counts were compiled to place criteria in rank order to determine whether or not a common body of criteria was perceived by the teachers as being important in the evaluation of teachers for both evaluative situations to see if the teachers perceived a change of emphasis in the use of each criterion from one evaluative situation to the other. Pearson correlation coefficients were utilized to determine whether the emphasis placed upon the criterion changed with each evaluative situation. Chi square tests were used to ascertain if significant differences existed in the responses of teachers according the personal and school variables. -- For the question, “Who is in the best position to evaluate?”, frequency counts were compiled to determine whom the teachers felt was in the best position to evaluate their work. Chi square tests were also used to ascertain whether or not significant differences existed in the responses of the teachers according to personal ...