High school students' views of the nature of science

This study examined high school students' views of the nature of science. A stratified random sample of 32 students chosen from nine schools in eastern and central Newfoundland were interviewed on an individual basis. The interviews were semi-structured and were administered in general accordan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barry, Maurice A.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Memorial University of Newfoundland 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.library.mun.ca/5126/
https://research.library.mun.ca/5126/1/Barry_MauriceA.pdf
https://research.library.mun.ca/5126/3/Barry_MauriceA.pdf
Description
Summary:This study examined high school students' views of the nature of science. A stratified random sample of 32 students chosen from nine schools in eastern and central Newfoundland were interviewed on an individual basis. The interviews were semi-structured and were administered in general accordance with an interview guide. The transcripts were reduced to a set of individualized conceptual inventories. The frequency of occurrence of each representative statement was tallied and tabulated. A number of general trends were identified. Most students were found to have difficulty establishing the domain of science although many tended to view the practice of science as cumulative. Although the majority of the sample asserted that scientific information was tentative and provisional, they tended to regard factual information in science to be absolute and irrefutable. Scientific theories appeared to be only understood in a naive sense in that most subjects regarded theories as suggested explanations for fairly discrete events as opposed to elaborate interpretive frameworks. In accordance with previously documented evidence (Aikenhead, 1987) many subjects were found to equate the term "scientific law" with the more common legal usage of the word. Finally, elements of what Nadeau and Desautels (1984) term as naive realism, blissful empiricism, credulous experimentalism and excessive rationalism were found to be quite prevalent in the transcripts.