The implications for aboriginal groups in Newfoundland and Labrador regarding changes to access/allocation provisions contained in the proposed federal fisheries act
As Caddy noted, "access to and allocation of fish resources remains one of the most difficult and controversial aspects of fisheries management in Canada and abroad" (Dooley, 2004). It is generally agreed that access and allocation issues associated with harvesting rights remains a divisiv...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Memorial University of Newfoundland
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://research.library.mun.ca/12272/ https://research.library.mun.ca/12272/1/Martin_Paul.pdf |
| Summary: | As Caddy noted, "access to and allocation of fish resources remains one of the most difficult and controversial aspects of fisheries management in Canada and abroad" (Dooley, 2004). It is generally agreed that access and allocation issues associated with harvesting rights remains a divisive and contentious issues for participants in the province's fishing industry. This is particularly true for Aboriginal groups in the province who have been challenged to capitalize on economic development opportunities associated with the fishery. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) has the challenging responsibility of responding to the demands of a range of provincial and territorial jurisdictions while at the same time considering the access/allocation needs of Aboriginal groups throughout the country. Various mechanisms have been introduced over the past decade to assist DFO with these access decisions. The Independent Panel on Access Criteria (IP AC) introduced in 2001 was one of these initiatives. IP AC was tasked with finding a solution to the decision making process involving access and the associated ranking or weighting, and defining access criteria. !PAC was successful in identifying various access principles and criteria but it did not fully address some of the outstanding problems related to access. It is important to note that the IP AC suggested that the issue of Aboriginal participation and access to the fishery required special consideration in the Panel's deliberations, due to the constitutional position of Aboriginal peoples. The Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy (AFS) was the other initiative designed to respond to the needs of the Aboriginal people in the country. Introduced in 1992, the AFS was intended to help DFO manage the fishery in a manner consistent with the Sparrow decision. It was intended to serve as a bridging arrangement in fisheries management during the negotiation of comprehensive land claims and self-government agreements. It applies where DFO manages the fishery and where land claim ... |
|---|