Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland

Land allocated to protected areas (PA) is expanding as are expectations about the services these areas deliver. There is a need to advance knowledge on PA governance systems, like co-management, recognising that there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution. We analyse the co-management governance system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land
Main Authors: Jon Geir Petursson, Dadi Mar Kristofersson
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070681
_version_ 1821549174512943104
author Jon Geir Petursson
Dadi Mar Kristofersson
author_facet Jon Geir Petursson
Dadi Mar Kristofersson
author_sort Jon Geir Petursson
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 7
container_start_page 681
container_title Land
container_volume 10
description Land allocated to protected areas (PA) is expanding as are expectations about the services these areas deliver. There is a need to advance knowledge on PA governance systems, like co-management, recognising that there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution. We analyse the co-management governance system and performance of Vatnajökull National Park (VNP), Iceland. We adapt an analytical framework from the literature on environmental governance and analyse its governance system, hence actor roles, institutional arrangements and interactions. Our findings illustrate that the co-management structure was an outcome of political negotiations and a response to the lack of legitimacy of its predecessors; resulting in a tailor-made governance system set out in park-specific legislation. Although the performance is quite positive, being adaptive to changes, inclusive, promoting rural development and an appreciated facilitator of devolution and power-sharing, it has come with challenges. It has encountered problems delineating responsibilities among its actors, causing conflict and confusion; in settling conflicting localised issues close to local stakeholders, there have been capacity issues. We argue that the VNP co-management system is fit for its purpose, aligned with Icelandic land-use governance structures but in need of systematic improvements. There are important lessons as Iceland seeks to expand its PA estate and beyond, since the global community is setting ambitious policy goals to expand site-based conservation.
format Text
genre Iceland
Vatnajökull
genre_facet Iceland
Vatnajökull
geographic Vatnajökull
geographic_facet Vatnajökull
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-445X/10/7/681/
institution Open Polar
language English
long_lat ENVELOPE(-16.823,-16.823,64.420,64.420)
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_coverage agris
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070681
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land10070681
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_source Land; Volume 10; Issue 7; Pages: 681
publishDate 2021
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-445X/10/7/681/ 2025-01-16T22:32:27+00:00 Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland Jon Geir Petursson Dadi Mar Kristofersson agris 2021-06-28 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070681 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land10070681 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Land; Volume 10; Issue 7; Pages: 681 co-management protected areas rural development governance system legitimacy Vatnajökull National Park Iceland Text 2021 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070681 2023-08-01T02:03:28Z Land allocated to protected areas (PA) is expanding as are expectations about the services these areas deliver. There is a need to advance knowledge on PA governance systems, like co-management, recognising that there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution. We analyse the co-management governance system and performance of Vatnajökull National Park (VNP), Iceland. We adapt an analytical framework from the literature on environmental governance and analyse its governance system, hence actor roles, institutional arrangements and interactions. Our findings illustrate that the co-management structure was an outcome of political negotiations and a response to the lack of legitimacy of its predecessors; resulting in a tailor-made governance system set out in park-specific legislation. Although the performance is quite positive, being adaptive to changes, inclusive, promoting rural development and an appreciated facilitator of devolution and power-sharing, it has come with challenges. It has encountered problems delineating responsibilities among its actors, causing conflict and confusion; in settling conflicting localised issues close to local stakeholders, there have been capacity issues. We argue that the VNP co-management system is fit for its purpose, aligned with Icelandic land-use governance structures but in need of systematic improvements. There are important lessons as Iceland seeks to expand its PA estate and beyond, since the global community is setting ambitious policy goals to expand site-based conservation. Text Iceland Vatnajökull MDPI Open Access Publishing Vatnajökull ENVELOPE(-16.823,-16.823,64.420,64.420) Land 10 7 681
spellingShingle co-management
protected areas
rural development
governance system
legitimacy
Vatnajökull National Park
Iceland
Jon Geir Petursson
Dadi Mar Kristofersson
Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title_full Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title_fullStr Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title_full_unstemmed Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title_short Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
title_sort co-management of protected areas: a governance system analysis of vatnajökull national park, iceland
topic co-management
protected areas
rural development
governance system
legitimacy
Vatnajökull National Park
Iceland
topic_facet co-management
protected areas
rural development
governance system
legitimacy
Vatnajökull National Park
Iceland
url https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070681