The 2015 Surge of Hispar Glacier in the Karakoram

The Karakoram mountain range is well known for its numerous surge-type glaciers of which several have recently surged or are still doing so. Analysis of multi-temporal satellite images and digital elevation models have revealed impressive details about the related changes (e.g., in glacier length, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Frank Paul, Tazio Strozzi, Thomas Schellenberger, Andreas Kääb
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090888
_version_ 1821520131611688960
author Frank Paul
Tazio Strozzi
Thomas Schellenberger
Andreas Kääb
author_facet Frank Paul
Tazio Strozzi
Thomas Schellenberger
Andreas Kääb
author_sort Frank Paul
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 9
container_start_page 888
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 9
description The Karakoram mountain range is well known for its numerous surge-type glaciers of which several have recently surged or are still doing so. Analysis of multi-temporal satellite images and digital elevation models have revealed impressive details about the related changes (e.g., in glacier length, surface elevation and flow velocities) and considerably expanded the database of known surge-type glaciers. One glacier that has so far only been reported as impacted by surging tributaries, rather than surging itself, is the 50 km long main trunk of Hispar Glacier in the Hunza catchment. We here present the evolution of flow velocities and surface features from its 2015/16 surge as revealed from a dense time series of SAR and optical images along with an analysis of historic satellite images. We observed maximum flow velocities of up to 14 m d−1 (5 km a−1) in spring 2015, sudden drops in summer velocities, a second increase in winter 2015/16 and a total advance of the surge front of about 6 km. During a few months the surge front velocity was much higher (about 90 m d−1) than the maximum flow velocity. We assume that one of its northern tributary glaciers, Yutmaru, initiated the surge at the end of summer 2014 and that the variability in flow velocities was driven by changes in the basal hydrologic regime (Alaska-type surge). We further provide evidence that Hispar Glacier has surged before (around 1960) over a distance of about 10 km so that it can also be regarded as a surge-type glacier.
format Text
genre glacier
glaciers
Alaska
genre_facet glacier
glaciers
Alaska
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/9/9/888/
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_coverage agris
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090888
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs9090888
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 9; Issue 9; Pages: 888
publishDate 2017
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/9/9/888/ 2025-01-16T22:01:17+00:00 The 2015 Surge of Hispar Glacier in the Karakoram Frank Paul Tazio Strozzi Thomas Schellenberger Andreas Kääb agris 2017-08-26 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090888 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs9090888 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 9; Issue 9; Pages: 888 Karakoram Hispar Glacier surge hydrology controlled velocity time series Landsat Sentinel-1 Corona Text 2017 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090888 2023-07-31T21:12:34Z The Karakoram mountain range is well known for its numerous surge-type glaciers of which several have recently surged or are still doing so. Analysis of multi-temporal satellite images and digital elevation models have revealed impressive details about the related changes (e.g., in glacier length, surface elevation and flow velocities) and considerably expanded the database of known surge-type glaciers. One glacier that has so far only been reported as impacted by surging tributaries, rather than surging itself, is the 50 km long main trunk of Hispar Glacier in the Hunza catchment. We here present the evolution of flow velocities and surface features from its 2015/16 surge as revealed from a dense time series of SAR and optical images along with an analysis of historic satellite images. We observed maximum flow velocities of up to 14 m d−1 (5 km a−1) in spring 2015, sudden drops in summer velocities, a second increase in winter 2015/16 and a total advance of the surge front of about 6 km. During a few months the surge front velocity was much higher (about 90 m d−1) than the maximum flow velocity. We assume that one of its northern tributary glaciers, Yutmaru, initiated the surge at the end of summer 2014 and that the variability in flow velocities was driven by changes in the basal hydrologic regime (Alaska-type surge). We further provide evidence that Hispar Glacier has surged before (around 1960) over a distance of about 10 km so that it can also be regarded as a surge-type glacier. Text glacier glaciers Alaska MDPI Open Access Publishing Remote Sensing 9 9 888
spellingShingle Karakoram
Hispar Glacier
surge
hydrology controlled
velocity
time series
Landsat
Sentinel-1
Corona
Frank Paul
Tazio Strozzi
Thomas Schellenberger
Andreas Kääb
The 2015 Surge of Hispar Glacier in the Karakoram
title The 2015 Surge of Hispar Glacier in the Karakoram
title_full The 2015 Surge of Hispar Glacier in the Karakoram
title_fullStr The 2015 Surge of Hispar Glacier in the Karakoram
title_full_unstemmed The 2015 Surge of Hispar Glacier in the Karakoram
title_short The 2015 Surge of Hispar Glacier in the Karakoram
title_sort 2015 surge of hispar glacier in the karakoram
topic Karakoram
Hispar Glacier
surge
hydrology controlled
velocity
time series
Landsat
Sentinel-1
Corona
topic_facet Karakoram
Hispar Glacier
surge
hydrology controlled
velocity
time series
Landsat
Sentinel-1
Corona
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090888