Seasonal Progression of Ground Displacement Identified with Satellite Radar Interferometry and the Impact of Unusually Warm Conditions on Permafrost at the Yamal Peninsula in 2016

Ground subsidence monitoring by Synthetic Aperture Radar interferometry (InSAR) over Arctic permafrost areas is largely limited by long revisit intervals, which can lead to signal decorrelation. Recent satellite missions such as COSMO-Skymed (X-band) and Sentinel-1 (C-band) have comparably short tim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Annett Bartsch, Marina Leibman, Tazio Strozzi, Artem Khomutov, Barbara Widhalm, Elena Babkina, Damir Mullanurov, Ksenia Ermokhina, Christine Kroisleitner, Helena Bergstedt
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161865
_version_ 1821836652922798080
author Annett Bartsch
Marina Leibman
Tazio Strozzi
Artem Khomutov
Barbara Widhalm
Elena Babkina
Damir Mullanurov
Ksenia Ermokhina
Christine Kroisleitner
Helena Bergstedt
author_facet Annett Bartsch
Marina Leibman
Tazio Strozzi
Artem Khomutov
Barbara Widhalm
Elena Babkina
Damir Mullanurov
Ksenia Ermokhina
Christine Kroisleitner
Helena Bergstedt
author_sort Annett Bartsch
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 16
container_start_page 1865
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 11
description Ground subsidence monitoring by Synthetic Aperture Radar interferometry (InSAR) over Arctic permafrost areas is largely limited by long revisit intervals, which can lead to signal decorrelation. Recent satellite missions such as COSMO-Skymed (X-band) and Sentinel-1 (C-band) have comparably short time intervals of a few days. We analyze dense records of COSMO-Skymed from 2013 and 2016 and of Sentinel-1 from 2016, 2017, and 2018 for the unfrozen period over central Yamal (Russia). These years were distinct in environmental conditions and 2016 in particular was unusually warm. We evaluate the InSAR-derived displacement with in situ subsidence records, active-layer thickness measurements, borehole temperature records, meteorological data, C-band scatterometer records, and a land-cover classification based on Sentinel-1 and -2 data. Our results indicate that a comparison of seasonal thaw evolution between years is feasible after accounting for the early thaw data gap in InSAR time series (as a result of snow cover) through an assessment with respect to degree-days of thawing. Average rates of subsidence agree between in situ and Sentinel-1 (corrected for viewing geometry), with 3.9 mm and 4.3 mm per 100 degree-days of thaw at the test site. X-band and C-band records agree well with each other, including seasonal evolution of subsidence. The average displacement is more than twice in magnitude at the active-layer monitoring test site in 2016 compared to the other years. We further demonstrate that InSAR displacement can not only provide information on the magnitude of ground thaw but also on soil properties through analyses of seasonal evolution in extreme years.
format Text
genre Active layer monitoring
Active layer thickness
Arctic
permafrost
Yamal Peninsula
genre_facet Active layer monitoring
Active layer thickness
Arctic
permafrost
Yamal Peninsula
geographic Arctic
Yamal Peninsula
geographic_facet Arctic
Yamal Peninsula
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/11/16/1865/
institution Open Polar
language English
long_lat ENVELOPE(69.873,69.873,70.816,70.816)
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_coverage agris
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161865
op_relation Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11161865
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 11; Issue 16; Pages: 1865
publishDate 2019
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/11/16/1865/ 2025-01-16T18:34:49+00:00 Seasonal Progression of Ground Displacement Identified with Satellite Radar Interferometry and the Impact of Unusually Warm Conditions on Permafrost at the Yamal Peninsula in 2016 Annett Bartsch Marina Leibman Tazio Strozzi Artem Khomutov Barbara Widhalm Elena Babkina Damir Mullanurov Ksenia Ermokhina Christine Kroisleitner Helena Bergstedt agris 2019-08-09 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161865 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11161865 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 11; Issue 16; Pages: 1865 permafrost subsidence InSAR Text 2019 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161865 2023-07-31T22:30:32Z Ground subsidence monitoring by Synthetic Aperture Radar interferometry (InSAR) over Arctic permafrost areas is largely limited by long revisit intervals, which can lead to signal decorrelation. Recent satellite missions such as COSMO-Skymed (X-band) and Sentinel-1 (C-band) have comparably short time intervals of a few days. We analyze dense records of COSMO-Skymed from 2013 and 2016 and of Sentinel-1 from 2016, 2017, and 2018 for the unfrozen period over central Yamal (Russia). These years were distinct in environmental conditions and 2016 in particular was unusually warm. We evaluate the InSAR-derived displacement with in situ subsidence records, active-layer thickness measurements, borehole temperature records, meteorological data, C-band scatterometer records, and a land-cover classification based on Sentinel-1 and -2 data. Our results indicate that a comparison of seasonal thaw evolution between years is feasible after accounting for the early thaw data gap in InSAR time series (as a result of snow cover) through an assessment with respect to degree-days of thawing. Average rates of subsidence agree between in situ and Sentinel-1 (corrected for viewing geometry), with 3.9 mm and 4.3 mm per 100 degree-days of thaw at the test site. X-band and C-band records agree well with each other, including seasonal evolution of subsidence. The average displacement is more than twice in magnitude at the active-layer monitoring test site in 2016 compared to the other years. We further demonstrate that InSAR displacement can not only provide information on the magnitude of ground thaw but also on soil properties through analyses of seasonal evolution in extreme years. Text Active layer monitoring Active layer thickness Arctic permafrost Yamal Peninsula MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Yamal Peninsula ENVELOPE(69.873,69.873,70.816,70.816) Remote Sensing 11 16 1865
spellingShingle permafrost
subsidence
InSAR
Annett Bartsch
Marina Leibman
Tazio Strozzi
Artem Khomutov
Barbara Widhalm
Elena Babkina
Damir Mullanurov
Ksenia Ermokhina
Christine Kroisleitner
Helena Bergstedt
Seasonal Progression of Ground Displacement Identified with Satellite Radar Interferometry and the Impact of Unusually Warm Conditions on Permafrost at the Yamal Peninsula in 2016
title Seasonal Progression of Ground Displacement Identified with Satellite Radar Interferometry and the Impact of Unusually Warm Conditions on Permafrost at the Yamal Peninsula in 2016
title_full Seasonal Progression of Ground Displacement Identified with Satellite Radar Interferometry and the Impact of Unusually Warm Conditions on Permafrost at the Yamal Peninsula in 2016
title_fullStr Seasonal Progression of Ground Displacement Identified with Satellite Radar Interferometry and the Impact of Unusually Warm Conditions on Permafrost at the Yamal Peninsula in 2016
title_full_unstemmed Seasonal Progression of Ground Displacement Identified with Satellite Radar Interferometry and the Impact of Unusually Warm Conditions on Permafrost at the Yamal Peninsula in 2016
title_short Seasonal Progression of Ground Displacement Identified with Satellite Radar Interferometry and the Impact of Unusually Warm Conditions on Permafrost at the Yamal Peninsula in 2016
title_sort seasonal progression of ground displacement identified with satellite radar interferometry and the impact of unusually warm conditions on permafrost at the yamal peninsula in 2016
topic permafrost
subsidence
InSAR
topic_facet permafrost
subsidence
InSAR
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161865