Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?

The Icelandic economy has transitioned from being dependent on fishing and agriculture to having tourism and refined aluminum as its main exports. Nevertheless, the new main industries still rely on the country’s natural resources, as the power intensive industry uses energy from rivers and geotherm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability
Main Authors: Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir, C. Michael Hall
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642
_version_ 1821555746004795392
author Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir
C. Michael Hall
author_facet Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir
C. Michael Hall
author_sort Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3642
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 11
description The Icelandic economy has transitioned from being dependent on fishing and agriculture to having tourism and refined aluminum as its main exports. Nevertheless, the new main industries still rely on the country’s natural resources, as the power intensive industry uses energy from rivers and geothermal areas whereas tourism uses the natural landscape, where geysers, waterfalls and thermal pools are part of the attraction to visitors. Although both industries claim to contribute to sustainability they utilize the same resources, and land-use conflicts can be expected, illustrating the contestation that can occur between different visions and understandings of sustainability. This paper focuses on the attitudes of Icelandic tourism operators towards power production and proposed power plants using data from questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Results show that the majority of Icelandic tourism operators assume further power utilization would be in conflict with nature-based tourism, and they are generally negative towards all types of renewable energy development and power plant infrastructure. Respondents are most negative towards transmission lines, reservoirs and hydro power plants in the country’s interior Highlands. About 40% of the respondents perceive that existing power plants have negatively affected tourism, while a similar proportion think they had no impact. According to the respondents, the two industries could co-exist with improved spatial planning, management and inter-sectoral cooperation.
format Text
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2071-1050/11/13/3642/
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_coverage agris
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642
op_relation Tourism, Culture, and Heritage
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11133642
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_source Sustainability; Volume 11; Issue 13; Pages: 3642
publishDate 2019
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2071-1050/11/13/3642/ 2025-01-16T22:39:02+00:00 Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland? Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir C. Michael Hall agris 2019-07-02 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Tourism, Culture, and Heritage https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11133642 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Sustainability; Volume 11; Issue 13; Pages: 3642 land use conflicts tourism industry nature-based tourism sustainable power production renewable energy development Text 2019 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642 2023-07-31T22:24:21Z The Icelandic economy has transitioned from being dependent on fishing and agriculture to having tourism and refined aluminum as its main exports. Nevertheless, the new main industries still rely on the country’s natural resources, as the power intensive industry uses energy from rivers and geothermal areas whereas tourism uses the natural landscape, where geysers, waterfalls and thermal pools are part of the attraction to visitors. Although both industries claim to contribute to sustainability they utilize the same resources, and land-use conflicts can be expected, illustrating the contestation that can occur between different visions and understandings of sustainability. This paper focuses on the attitudes of Icelandic tourism operators towards power production and proposed power plants using data from questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Results show that the majority of Icelandic tourism operators assume further power utilization would be in conflict with nature-based tourism, and they are generally negative towards all types of renewable energy development and power plant infrastructure. Respondents are most negative towards transmission lines, reservoirs and hydro power plants in the country’s interior Highlands. About 40% of the respondents perceive that existing power plants have negatively affected tourism, while a similar proportion think they had no impact. According to the respondents, the two industries could co-exist with improved spatial planning, management and inter-sectoral cooperation. Text Iceland MDPI Open Access Publishing Sustainability 11 13 3642
spellingShingle land use conflicts
tourism industry
nature-based tourism
sustainable power production
renewable energy development
Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir
C. Michael Hall
Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title_full Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title_fullStr Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title_full_unstemmed Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title_short Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title_sort contested development paths and rural communities: sustainable energy or sustainable tourism in iceland?
topic land use conflicts
tourism industry
nature-based tourism
sustainable power production
renewable energy development
topic_facet land use conflicts
tourism industry
nature-based tourism
sustainable power production
renewable energy development
url https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642