Comparing Two Independent Satellite-Based Algorithms for Detecting and Tracking Ash Clouds by Using SEVIRI Sensor
The Eyjafjallajökull (Iceland) volcanic eruption of April–May 2010 caused unprecedented air-traffic disruption in Northern Europe, revealing some important weaknesses of current operational ash-monitoring and forecasting systems and encouraging the improvement of methods and procedures for supportin...
Published in: | Sensors |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020369 |
_version_ | 1821507265703706624 |
---|---|
author | Alfredo Falconieri Michael Cooke Carolina Filizzola Francesco Marchese Nicola Pergola Valerio Tramutoli |
author_facet | Alfredo Falconieri Michael Cooke Carolina Filizzola Francesco Marchese Nicola Pergola Valerio Tramutoli |
author_sort | Alfredo Falconieri |
collection | MDPI Open Access Publishing |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 369 |
container_title | Sensors |
container_volume | 18 |
description | The Eyjafjallajökull (Iceland) volcanic eruption of April–May 2010 caused unprecedented air-traffic disruption in Northern Europe, revealing some important weaknesses of current operational ash-monitoring and forecasting systems and encouraging the improvement of methods and procedures for supporting the activities of Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers (VAACs) better. In this work, we compare two established satellite-based algorithms for ash detection, namely RSTASH and the operational London VAAC method, both exploiting sensor data of the spinning enhanced visible and infrared imager (SEVIRI). We analyze similarities and differences in the identification of ash clouds during the different phases of the Eyjafjallajökull eruption. The work reveals, in some cases, a certain complementary behavior of the two techniques, whose combination might improve the identification of ash-affected areas in specific conditions. This is indicated by the quantitative comparison of the merged SEVIRI ash product, achieved integrating outputs of the RSTASH and London VAAC methods, with independent atmospheric infrared sounder (AIRS) DDA (dust-detection algorithm) observations. |
format | Text |
genre | Eyjafjallajökull Iceland |
genre_facet | Eyjafjallajökull Iceland |
id | ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1424-8220/18/2/369/ |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftmdpi |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020369 |
op_relation | Remote Sensors https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18020369 |
op_rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
op_source | Sensors; Volume 18; Issue 2; Pages: 369 |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1424-8220/18/2/369/ 2025-01-16T21:47:41+00:00 Comparing Two Independent Satellite-Based Algorithms for Detecting and Tracking Ash Clouds by Using SEVIRI Sensor Alfredo Falconieri Michael Cooke Carolina Filizzola Francesco Marchese Nicola Pergola Valerio Tramutoli 2018-01-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020369 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Remote Sensors https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18020369 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Sensors; Volume 18; Issue 2; Pages: 369 Eyjafjallajökull ash clouds SEVIRI AIRS RST ASH London VAAC method Text 2018 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020369 2023-07-31T21:22:02Z The Eyjafjallajökull (Iceland) volcanic eruption of April–May 2010 caused unprecedented air-traffic disruption in Northern Europe, revealing some important weaknesses of current operational ash-monitoring and forecasting systems and encouraging the improvement of methods and procedures for supporting the activities of Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers (VAACs) better. In this work, we compare two established satellite-based algorithms for ash detection, namely RSTASH and the operational London VAAC method, both exploiting sensor data of the spinning enhanced visible and infrared imager (SEVIRI). We analyze similarities and differences in the identification of ash clouds during the different phases of the Eyjafjallajökull eruption. The work reveals, in some cases, a certain complementary behavior of the two techniques, whose combination might improve the identification of ash-affected areas in specific conditions. This is indicated by the quantitative comparison of the merged SEVIRI ash product, achieved integrating outputs of the RSTASH and London VAAC methods, with independent atmospheric infrared sounder (AIRS) DDA (dust-detection algorithm) observations. Text Eyjafjallajökull Iceland MDPI Open Access Publishing Sensors 18 2 369 |
spellingShingle | Eyjafjallajökull ash clouds SEVIRI AIRS RST ASH London VAAC method Alfredo Falconieri Michael Cooke Carolina Filizzola Francesco Marchese Nicola Pergola Valerio Tramutoli Comparing Two Independent Satellite-Based Algorithms for Detecting and Tracking Ash Clouds by Using SEVIRI Sensor |
title | Comparing Two Independent Satellite-Based Algorithms for Detecting and Tracking Ash Clouds by Using SEVIRI Sensor |
title_full | Comparing Two Independent Satellite-Based Algorithms for Detecting and Tracking Ash Clouds by Using SEVIRI Sensor |
title_fullStr | Comparing Two Independent Satellite-Based Algorithms for Detecting and Tracking Ash Clouds by Using SEVIRI Sensor |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Two Independent Satellite-Based Algorithms for Detecting and Tracking Ash Clouds by Using SEVIRI Sensor |
title_short | Comparing Two Independent Satellite-Based Algorithms for Detecting and Tracking Ash Clouds by Using SEVIRI Sensor |
title_sort | comparing two independent satellite-based algorithms for detecting and tracking ash clouds by using seviri sensor |
topic | Eyjafjallajökull ash clouds SEVIRI AIRS RST ASH London VAAC method |
topic_facet | Eyjafjallajökull ash clouds SEVIRI AIRS RST ASH London VAAC method |
url | https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020369 |