The SAMI Galaxy Survey:mass-kinematics scaling relations
We use data from the Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral-field spectroscopy (SAMI) Galaxy Survey to study the dynamical scaling relation between galaxy stellar mass M ∗ and the general kinematic parameter S K = √KV 2 rot + σ 2 that combines rotation velocity Vrot and velocity dispersion σ. We show that...
Published in: | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/a950151f-2fba-43e0-acf4-7f7684a7d66d https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1439 https://research-management.mq.edu.au/ws/files/106308706/106300320.pdf http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071155577&partnerID=8YFLogxK http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE1101020 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE170100013 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT140100255 |
Summary: | We use data from the Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral-field spectroscopy (SAMI) Galaxy Survey to study the dynamical scaling relation between galaxy stellar mass M ∗ and the general kinematic parameter S K = √KV 2 rot + σ 2 that combines rotation velocity Vrot and velocity dispersion σ. We show that the logM ∗ - logSK relation: (1) is linear above limits set by properties of the samples and observations; (2) has slightly different slope when derived from stellar or gas kinematic measurements; (3) applies to both early-type and late-type galaxies and has smaller scatter than either the Tully.Fisher relation (logM ∗ - log V rot ) for late types or the Faber.Jackson relation (logM ∗ - log σ) for early types; and (4) has scatter that is only weakly sensitive to the value of K, with minimum scatter for K in the range 0.4 and 0.7. We compare SK to the aperture second moment (the 'aperture velocity dispersion') measured from the integrated spectrum within a 3-arcsecond radius aperture (σ 3″ ). We find that while SK and σ 3″ are in general tightly correlated, the logM ∗ - log SK relation has less scatter than the logM ∗ - log σ 3″ relation. |
---|