Climatic barriers to soft-mobility in winter : Lulea, Sweden as case study

Urban form can moderate the effects of weather on human movement. As such, the interrelationship between built environment, weather and human movement is a critical component of urban design. This paper explores the impacts of weather on non-motorised human movement (soft-mobility). Throughout we lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainable Cities and Society
Main Authors: Chapman, David, Nilsson, Kristina, Larsson, Agneta, Rizzo, Agatino
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Luleå tekniska universitet, Arkitektur och vatten 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-65555
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.003
Description
Summary:Urban form can moderate the effects of weather on human movement. As such, the interrelationship between built environment, weather and human movement is a critical component of urban design. This paper explores the impacts of weather on non-motorised human movement (soft-mobility). Throughout we look at soft-mobility from the citizen’s perspective and highlight the barriers to soft-mobility in winter. The aim of this study was to test the traditional pallet of winter city urban design considerations. Those of solar-access, wind and snow management and explore other weather and terrain conditions that act as barriers to soft-mobility in winter. This study is based on survey responses from 344 citizens in the sub-arctic area of Sweden. Outcomes from the research highlight that rain, icy surfaces and darkness are today’s most significant barriers to soft-mobility in winter. Results from this study link changing barriers to soft-mobility in winter with climate change. The paper concludes that future urban design and planning for winter cities needs to consider a wider pallet of weather conditions, especially rain. Validerad;2017;Nivå 2;2017-09-14 (andbra)