The effect of flow speed and food size on the capture efficiency and feeding behaviour of the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa

The capture efficiency and feeding behaviour of the cold-water coral (CWC) Lophelia pertusa (Linnaeus, 1758 were investigated considering: (1) different food types, (2) different food sizes and (3) different current speeds and temperatures. This study used two different multifactorial experimental a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
Main Authors: Orejas, C, Gori, A, Rad-Menendez, C, Last, KS, Davies, AJ, Beveridge, CM, Sadd, D, Kiriakoulakis, K, Witte, U, Roberts, JM
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4169/
https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4169/1/Orejas%20et%20al.%202016.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.04.002
Description
Summary:The capture efficiency and feeding behaviour of the cold-water coral (CWC) Lophelia pertusa (Linnaeus, 1758 were investigated considering: (1) different food types, (2) different food sizes and (3) different current speeds and temperatures. This study used two different multifactorial experimental approaches: (1) Corals were subjected to three different flow speeds (2, 5 and 10 cm s−1) in 5 l volume tanks, and three different food types (alive zooplankton, alive algae, and dry particulate organic carbon) were offered to the corals under each current regime, analysing the capture rates of the corals under these different flow velocities. (2) In a flume, the feeding behaviour of the coral polyps was studied under different current speed regimes (1, 7, 15 and 27 cm s−1) and a temperature change over a range of 8–12 °C. The obtained results confirm that lowflowspeeds (below7 cm s−1) appear optimal for a successful prey capture, and temperature did not have an effect on polyp expansion behaviour for L. pertusa. Inconclusion, flowspeeds clearly impact food capture efficiency in L. pertusa,with zooplankton predominantly captured prey at lowflow velocities (2 cms−1) and phytoplankton captured at higher flow velocities of 5 cm s−1. This split in capture efficiency may allowcorals to exploit different food sources under different tidal and flow conditions.