A European evaluation of the patients’ role in clinical education: a six-country cross sectional

Aim The aim of this study was to analyse the patients’ role in clinical education in terms of facilitative student-patient relationship in Finland, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Lithuania and Spain and factors promoting a more facilitative relationship in clinical education. Background Nursing students...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nurse Education in Practice
Main Authors: Koskinen, Sanna, Leino-Kilpi, Helena, Blöndal, Katrín, Brasaitė-Abromė, Indrė, Burke, Eimear, Fitzgerald, Serena, Fuster, Pilar, Kielė, Viktorija, Löyttyniemi, Eliisa, Salminen, Leena, Stubner, Juliane, Suikkala, Arja
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vb.ku.lt/KU:ELABAPDB116877804&prefLang=en_US
Description
Summary:Aim The aim of this study was to analyse the patients’ role in clinical education in terms of facilitative student-patient relationship in Finland, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Lithuania and Spain and factors promoting a more facilitative relationship in clinical education. Background Nursing students’ bedside learning is reliant on patients and the establishment of a person-centred approach develops from the relationships with patients. Design A multi-country, cross-sectional design was implemented. Methods Survey data were collected from graduating nursing students and patients between May 2018 and March 2019. The survey consisted of a 13-item facilitative sub-scale of the Student-Patient Relationship Scale as the main outcome measure, which was identical for both populations. In addition, background factors were surveyed with single questions and other scales. Associations between facilitative relationship and background factors were studied with linear models. Results Altogether, 1,796 students and 1,327 patients answered the survey. Overall, both students and patients regarded their relationship as facilitative, but students’ (median 4.23, 95% confidence interval 4.15–4.23) evaluations were higher than patients’ (median 3.75, 95% confidence interval 3.69–3.77). The students’ and patients’ evaluations differed from each other significantly in all other countries except in Ireland and Lithuania. Corresponding associations for both populations were found in terms of the country and students’ cultural confidence. Conclusions Results signal favourable grounds for students’ bedside learning and patient participation in clinical education with the potential to foster a person-centred approach.