Hair mineral levels as indicator of wildlife demographics?—a pilot study of muskoxen

The tight linkage between mineral status and health and demographics in animals is well documented. Mineral deficiencies have been coupled to population declines in wildlife. Current practices typically rely on liver, kidney and/or serum samples to assess mineral levels. Such destructive sampling st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Research
Main Authors: Mosbacher, Jesper Bruun, Desforges, Jean-Pierre, Michelsen, Anders, Hansson, Sophia V., Stelvig, Mikkel, Eulaers, Igor, Sonne, Christian, Dietz, Rune, Jenssen, Bjørn Munro, Ciesielski, Tomasz Maciej, Lierhagen, Syverin, Flaten, Trond Peder, Le Roux, Gaël, Aggerbeck, Marie R., Schmidt, Niels Martin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Norwegian Polar Institute 2022
Subjects:
Demographics
minerals
population dynamics
wool
Ovibos moschatus
calf recruitment
Arctic
Greenland
muskox
ovibos moschatus
Polar Research
Online Access:https://polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/view/8543
https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.8543
Description
Summary:The tight linkage between mineral status and health and demographics in animals is well documented. Mineral deficiencies have been coupled to population declines in wildlife. Current practices typically rely on liver, kidney and/or serum samples to assess mineral levels. Such destructive sampling strategies are, however, not feasible for remote or endangered populations. Hair may constitute an alternative tissue, sampled through non-invasive means, to investigate mineral levels in wildlife. In the pilot study presented here, we examine whether mineral levels in hair samples from a well-studied muskox (Ovibos moschatus) population in High-Arctic Greenland are associated with a vital rate and may, therefore, serve as indicators of wildlife population demographics. We show that inter-annual variations in levels of three minerals—copper, selenium and molybdenum—are associated with fluctuations in annual calf recruitment, with poor recruitment in years of low mineral levels in hair. Local environmental conditions also varied with calf recruitment but appeared to be less robust predictors of calf recruitment than hair mineral levels. Our results suggest that hair mineral levels may serve as an indicator of vital demographic rates and, ultimately, of wildlife population trends. This article has a relatedCorrigendum.

Similar Items