Resource pulses and human–wildlife conflicts

The article processing charge was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 491192747 and the Open Access Publication Fund of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Pulsed resources have prominent effects on community and ecosystem dynamics; however, there is little...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bautista, Carlos, Oeser, Julian, Kuemmerle, Tobias, Selva, Nuria
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/26942
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/26942-3
https://doi.org/10.18452/26269
https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.302
Description
Summary:The article processing charge was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 491192747 and the Open Access Publication Fund of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Pulsed resources have prominent effects on community and ecosystem dynamics; however, there is little research on how resource pulses affect human–wildlife interactions. Tree masting is a common type of pulsed resource that represents a crucial food for many species and has important bottom-up effects in food webs. In anthropogenic landscapes, years of food shortage after mast years can have negative outcomes for both people and wildlife, for instance when an increased use of anthropogenic foods by animals exacerbates human–wildlife conflicts. Here, we used novel remote sensing indicators of forest productivity and phenology, together with weather cues and ground measures of mast production, to assess whether years of masting and crop failures lead to changes in human–wildlife conflict occurrence. We used a unique 14-year dataset including the production of European beech Fagus sylvatica seeds and brown bear Ursus arctos damage in the northeastern Carpathians as our model system. Linking these data in a panel regression framework, we found that temporal fluctuations in damage occurrence were sensitive to the year-to-year variation in beechnut production. Specifically, the number of damages during bear hyperphagia (i.e., September to December, when bears need to accumulate fat reserves prior to hibernation) was significantly higher in years with low beechnut production than in normal or mast years. Furthermore, we provide evidence that beech masting and failure can be predicted through a combination of remote-sensing, weather, and field indicators of forest productivity and phenology. We demonstrate how pulsed resources, such as tree masting, can percolate through food webs to amplify human–wildlife conflict in human-dominated landscapes. Given the recent range expansion of large carnivores and herbivores in many ...