A Proposed Ethogram of Large-Carnivore Predatory Behavior, Exemplified by the Wolf
Although predatory behavior is traditionally described by a basic ethogram composed of 3 phases (search, pursue, and capture), behavioral studies of large terrestrial carnivores generally use the concept of a “hunt” to classify and measure foraging. This approach is problematic because there is no c...
Published in: | Journal of Mammalogy |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/88/3/595 https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-119R1.1 |
_version_ | 1821487964838952960 |
---|---|
author | MacNulty, Daniel R. Mech, L. David Smith, Douglas W. |
author_facet | MacNulty, Daniel R. Mech, L. David Smith, Douglas W. |
author_sort | MacNulty, Daniel R. |
collection | HighWire Press (Stanford University) |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 595 |
container_title | Journal of Mammalogy |
container_volume | 88 |
description | Although predatory behavior is traditionally described by a basic ethogram composed of 3 phases (search, pursue, and capture), behavioral studies of large terrestrial carnivores generally use the concept of a “hunt” to classify and measure foraging. This approach is problematic because there is no consensus on what behaviors constitute a hunt. We therefore examined how the basic ethogram could be used as a common framework for classifying large-carnivore behavior. We used >2,150 h of observed wolf ( Canis lupus ) behavior in Yellowstone National Park, including 517 and 134 encounters with elk ( Cervus elaphus ) and American bison ( Bison bison ), respectively, to demonstrate the functional importance of several frequently described, but rarely quantified, patterns of large-carnivore behavior not explicitly described by the basic ethogram (approaching, watching, and attacking groups). To account for these additionally important behaviors we propose a modified form of the basic ethogram (search, approach, watch, attack-group, attack-individual, and capture). We tested the applicability of this ethogram by comparing it to 31 previous classifications and descriptions involving 7 other species and 5 other wolf populations. Close correspondence among studies suggests that this ethogram may provide a generally useful scheme for classifying large-carnivore predatory behavior that is behaviorally less ambiguous than the concept of a hunt. |
format | Text |
genre | Canis lupus Bison bison bison |
genre_facet | Canis lupus Bison bison bison |
id | fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:jmammal:88/3/595 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | fthighwire |
op_container_end_page | 605 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-119R1.1 |
op_relation | http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/88/3/595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-119R1.1 |
op_rights | Copyright (C) 2007, Oxford University Press |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:jmammal:88/3/595 2025-01-16T21:25:58+00:00 A Proposed Ethogram of Large-Carnivore Predatory Behavior, Exemplified by the Wolf MacNulty, Daniel R. Mech, L. David Smith, Douglas W. 2007-06-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/88/3/595 https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-119R1.1 en eng Oxford University Press http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/88/3/595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-119R1.1 Copyright (C) 2007, Oxford University Press Feature Articles TEXT 2007 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-119R1.1 2016-11-16T18:31:42Z Although predatory behavior is traditionally described by a basic ethogram composed of 3 phases (search, pursue, and capture), behavioral studies of large terrestrial carnivores generally use the concept of a “hunt” to classify and measure foraging. This approach is problematic because there is no consensus on what behaviors constitute a hunt. We therefore examined how the basic ethogram could be used as a common framework for classifying large-carnivore behavior. We used >2,150 h of observed wolf ( Canis lupus ) behavior in Yellowstone National Park, including 517 and 134 encounters with elk ( Cervus elaphus ) and American bison ( Bison bison ), respectively, to demonstrate the functional importance of several frequently described, but rarely quantified, patterns of large-carnivore behavior not explicitly described by the basic ethogram (approaching, watching, and attacking groups). To account for these additionally important behaviors we propose a modified form of the basic ethogram (search, approach, watch, attack-group, attack-individual, and capture). We tested the applicability of this ethogram by comparing it to 31 previous classifications and descriptions involving 7 other species and 5 other wolf populations. Close correspondence among studies suggests that this ethogram may provide a generally useful scheme for classifying large-carnivore predatory behavior that is behaviorally less ambiguous than the concept of a hunt. Text Canis lupus Bison bison bison HighWire Press (Stanford University) Journal of Mammalogy 88 3 595 605 |
spellingShingle | Feature Articles MacNulty, Daniel R. Mech, L. David Smith, Douglas W. A Proposed Ethogram of Large-Carnivore Predatory Behavior, Exemplified by the Wolf |
title | A Proposed Ethogram of Large-Carnivore Predatory Behavior, Exemplified by the Wolf |
title_full | A Proposed Ethogram of Large-Carnivore Predatory Behavior, Exemplified by the Wolf |
title_fullStr | A Proposed Ethogram of Large-Carnivore Predatory Behavior, Exemplified by the Wolf |
title_full_unstemmed | A Proposed Ethogram of Large-Carnivore Predatory Behavior, Exemplified by the Wolf |
title_short | A Proposed Ethogram of Large-Carnivore Predatory Behavior, Exemplified by the Wolf |
title_sort | proposed ethogram of large-carnivore predatory behavior, exemplified by the wolf |
topic | Feature Articles |
topic_facet | Feature Articles |
url | http://jmammal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/88/3/595 https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-119R1.1 |