Aerial hawking and landing: approach behaviour in Natterer's bats, Myotis nattereri (Kuhl 1818)
We compared the flight and echolocation behaviour of a vespertilionid bat ( Myotis nattereri ) approaching a large stationary or a small moving target. Bats were trained to either land on a landing grid or to catch a moving tethered mealworm. When closing in on these two targets, the bats emitted gr...
| Published in: | Journal of Experimental Biology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Company of Biologists
2007
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/short/210/24/4457 https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.007435 |
| Summary: | We compared the flight and echolocation behaviour of a vespertilionid bat ( Myotis nattereri ) approaching a large stationary or a small moving target. Bats were trained to either land on a landing grid or to catch a moving tethered mealworm. When closing in on these two targets, the bats emitted groups of sounds with increasing number of signals and decreasing pulse interval and duration. When pursuing the mealworm, the approach phase always ended with a terminal group consisting of buzz I and buzz II. When landing, the bats emitted either a terminal group consisting of buzz I alone, with one or two extra pulses, or a group consisting of buzz I and buzz II. In all situations, buzz I ended on average between 47–63 ms prior to contact with the target of interest, which is approximately the reaction time of bats. Therefore, the information collected in buzz II does not guide the bats to the target. The relevant part of the approach phase to reach the target ends with buzz I. The basic sound pattern of this part is rather similar and independent of whether the bats approach the large stationary or the small moving target. |
|---|