Krill space: a comparative assessment of mesoscale structuring in polar and temperate marine ecosystems

• Published in: ICES Journal of Marine Science
• Main Authors: Santora, Jarrod A., Sydeman, William J., Schroeder, Isaac D., Reiss, Christian S., Wells, Brian K., Field, John C., Cossio, Anthony M., Loeb, Valerie J.
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press 2012
• Subjects: ESSAS - Climate Effects on Polar/Subpolar Ecosystems; Antarctic; The Antarctic; Antarctic Peninsula; Cossio; Antarc*
• Online Access: http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/fss048v1; https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss048

<qd> Santora, J. A., Sydeman, W. J., Schroeder, I. D., Reiss, C. S., Wells, B. K., Field, J. C, Cossio, A. M., and Loeb, V. J. Krill space: a comparative assessment of mesoscale structuring in polar and temperate marine ecosystems. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, doi:10.1093/icesjms/fss048. </qd>The spatial organization, mesoscale variability, and habitat associations of krill within portions of the Antarctic Peninsula and California Current marine ecosystems are compared. Using a decade of acoustic observations and remotely sensed oceanography (2000–2009), the hypothesis that mesoscale spatial organization of krill in both systems closely relates to geospatial variability of the shelf break and is non-linearly related to geostrophic flow and positively related to chlorophyll a (Chl a ) is tested. Directional-dependence analysis to measure spatial variability of krill is used along with spatially explicit generalized additive models to quantify and compare the spatial relationships among krill and habitat characteristics in both systems. The results suggest the following aspects of krill spatial organization: (i) areas of dense aggregation, i.e. hot spots, are present in both systems and are orientated in the direction of the shelf break, (ii) moderate levels of eddy kinetic energy seem to concentrate krill in favourable habitats and lessen the likelihood of advection away from the system, and (iii) variable responses to surface Chl a concentration suggest that real-time Chl a values may not be useful as a global predictor of important krill habitat. The results provide valuable reference points for marine spatial management of krill and for refining ecosystem and foodweb models.