Aftershocks of shallow earthquakes near Kamchatka Peninsula

We considered aftershock sequences of earthquakes with magnitude M = 4.0–7.8 recorded near the Kamchatka Peninsula coast at depths of 0–59 km in 1962–1987. The events of magnitude M > 1.0 that occurred in the 3 days following the main shock and located not further than 50 km from the main shock e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Journal International
Main Authors: Zobin, Vyacheslav M., Ivanova, Elena I.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 1992
Subjects:
Online Access:http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/108/3/749
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb03466.x
_version_ 1821565759449464832
author Zobin, Vyacheslav M.
Ivanova, Elena I.
author_facet Zobin, Vyacheslav M.
Ivanova, Elena I.
author_sort Zobin, Vyacheslav M.
collection HighWire Press (Stanford University)
container_issue 3
container_start_page 749
container_title Geophysical Journal International
container_volume 108
description We considered aftershock sequences of earthquakes with magnitude M = 4.0–7.8 recorded near the Kamchatka Peninsula coast at depths of 0–59 km in 1962–1987. The events of magnitude M > 1.0 that occurred in the 3 days following the main shock and located not further than 50 km from the main shock epicentre were recognized as aftershocks. Two types of aftershock sequences were distinguished: quakes with one to four aftershocks and quakes having more numerous aftershocks. Aftershock sequences of the first type comprise the majority of the considered events (more than 80 per cent). They are distributed within the overall seismic zone. Aftershock sequences of the second type tend to cluster in space. This type of aftershock sequence zoning can be a useful supplement to standard seismic zoning. The space distribution of the second type of aftershock was used to estimate the dimensions of the source of the main shock. A correlational dependence of source length and area upon energy, magnitude and seismic moment was obtained. Comparison of these estimates of source dimensions with those obtained from P -wave spectra corner frequencies shows good agreement. It has been shown that there exists a linear dependence between energy of the main shock and energetic difference between the main shock and the largest aftershock.
format Text
genre Kamchatka
Kamchatka Peninsula
genre_facet Kamchatka
Kamchatka Peninsula
geographic Kamchatka Peninsula
geographic_facet Kamchatka Peninsula
id fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:gji:108/3/749
institution Open Polar
language English
long_lat ENVELOPE(160.000,160.000,56.000,56.000)
op_collection_id fthighwire
op_container_end_page 757
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb03466.x
op_relation http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/108/3/749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb03466.x
op_rights Copyright (C) 1992, Oxford University Press
publishDate 1992
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format openpolar
spelling fthighwire:oai:open-archive.highwire.org:gji:108/3/749 2025-01-16T22:48:40+00:00 Aftershocks of shallow earthquakes near Kamchatka Peninsula Zobin, Vyacheslav M. Ivanova, Elena I. 1992-03-01 00:00:00.0 text/html http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/108/3/749 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb03466.x en eng Oxford University Press http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/108/3/749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb03466.x Copyright (C) 1992, Oxford University Press Articles TEXT 1992 fthighwire https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb03466.x 2015-02-28T18:02:00Z We considered aftershock sequences of earthquakes with magnitude M = 4.0–7.8 recorded near the Kamchatka Peninsula coast at depths of 0–59 km in 1962–1987. The events of magnitude M > 1.0 that occurred in the 3 days following the main shock and located not further than 50 km from the main shock epicentre were recognized as aftershocks. Two types of aftershock sequences were distinguished: quakes with one to four aftershocks and quakes having more numerous aftershocks. Aftershock sequences of the first type comprise the majority of the considered events (more than 80 per cent). They are distributed within the overall seismic zone. Aftershock sequences of the second type tend to cluster in space. This type of aftershock sequence zoning can be a useful supplement to standard seismic zoning. The space distribution of the second type of aftershock was used to estimate the dimensions of the source of the main shock. A correlational dependence of source length and area upon energy, magnitude and seismic moment was obtained. Comparison of these estimates of source dimensions with those obtained from P -wave spectra corner frequencies shows good agreement. It has been shown that there exists a linear dependence between energy of the main shock and energetic difference between the main shock and the largest aftershock. Text Kamchatka Kamchatka Peninsula HighWire Press (Stanford University) Kamchatka Peninsula ENVELOPE(160.000,160.000,56.000,56.000) Geophysical Journal International 108 3 749 757
spellingShingle Articles
Zobin, Vyacheslav M.
Ivanova, Elena I.
Aftershocks of shallow earthquakes near Kamchatka Peninsula
title Aftershocks of shallow earthquakes near Kamchatka Peninsula
title_full Aftershocks of shallow earthquakes near Kamchatka Peninsula
title_fullStr Aftershocks of shallow earthquakes near Kamchatka Peninsula
title_full_unstemmed Aftershocks of shallow earthquakes near Kamchatka Peninsula
title_short Aftershocks of shallow earthquakes near Kamchatka Peninsula
title_sort aftershocks of shallow earthquakes near kamchatka peninsula
topic Articles
topic_facet Articles
url http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/108/3/749
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb03466.x