West Uralic: Problems with taxonomy

There is no consensus on the taxonomy of Uralic, and different models exist even for the well-studied western branches of the family. Häkkinen’s (2007, 2009) idea that Saami, Finnic and Mordvin form a genealogical node (“West Uralic”), has received surprisingly wide acceptance in recent literature o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sampsa Holopainen, Juha Kuokkala
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
1162191:Uralic languages:Topic
1162192:Uralic languages > Classification:Topic
saami
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17613/bvfm-nz86
id fthcommons:oai:hcommons.org/hc:69061
record_format openpolar
spelling fthcommons:oai:hcommons.org/hc:69061 2024-10-13T14:10:30+00:00 West Uralic: Problems with taxonomy Sampsa Holopainen Juha Kuokkala 2023 https://doi.org/10.17613/bvfm-nz86 English eng 1162191:Uralic languages:Topic 1162192:Uralic languages--Classification:Topic 2023 fthcommons https://doi.org/10.17613/bvfm-nz86 2024-10-01T00:53:58Z There is no consensus on the taxonomy of Uralic, and different models exist even for the well-studied western branches of the family. Häkkinen’s (2007, 2009) idea that Saami, Finnic and Mordvin form a genealogical node (“West Uralic”), has received surprisingly wide acceptance in recent literature on linguistics as well as prehistory, even though the postulation of West Uralic is based on rather few arguments. In this poster we discuss the alleged phonological innovations and refute their probative value. Other/Unknown Material saami Humanities Commons CORE Deposits
institution Open Polar
collection Humanities Commons CORE Deposits
op_collection_id fthcommons
language English
topic 1162191:Uralic languages:Topic
1162192:Uralic languages--Classification:Topic
spellingShingle 1162191:Uralic languages:Topic
1162192:Uralic languages--Classification:Topic
Sampsa Holopainen
Juha Kuokkala
West Uralic: Problems with taxonomy
topic_facet 1162191:Uralic languages:Topic
1162192:Uralic languages--Classification:Topic
description There is no consensus on the taxonomy of Uralic, and different models exist even for the well-studied western branches of the family. Häkkinen’s (2007, 2009) idea that Saami, Finnic and Mordvin form a genealogical node (“West Uralic”), has received surprisingly wide acceptance in recent literature on linguistics as well as prehistory, even though the postulation of West Uralic is based on rather few arguments. In this poster we discuss the alleged phonological innovations and refute their probative value.
author Sampsa Holopainen
Juha Kuokkala
author_facet Sampsa Holopainen
Juha Kuokkala
author_sort Sampsa Holopainen
title West Uralic: Problems with taxonomy
title_short West Uralic: Problems with taxonomy
title_full West Uralic: Problems with taxonomy
title_fullStr West Uralic: Problems with taxonomy
title_full_unstemmed West Uralic: Problems with taxonomy
title_sort west uralic: problems with taxonomy
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.17613/bvfm-nz86
genre saami
genre_facet saami
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17613/bvfm-nz86
_version_ 1812817803983454208

Similar Items