| Summary: | Our understanding of the Earth´s functional biodiversity and its imprint on ecosystem functioning, structure and resilience is still incomplete. Large-scale information on vegetation properties (‘plant traits’) is critical to assess functional diversity and its role in the Earth system. Such parameters are constantly changing due to variations in environmental conditions which makes extensive in-situ measurements in the field not logistically feasible. The advent of the upcoming space-borne hyperspectral missions will facilitate to map these properties. However, we are still lacking efficient and accurate methods to translate hyperspectral reflectance into large scale information on plant traits across biomes, land cover and sensor types. Yet, the absence of globally representative data sets on reflectance data and the corresponding in-situ measurements represents a bottleneck to develop empirical models for estimating plant traits from hyperspectral reflectance. Recent and ongoing initiatives (e.g. EcoSIS) provide a constantly growing source of hyperspectral data and plant trait observations from different vegetation types and sensors. In this study we integrated 29 data sets including four different ecosystem types spanning from Europe to north America. By combining these heterogeneous data sets, we propose multi-trait models based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) that simultaneously infer multiple plant traits from canopy spectra. We targeted a broad set of structural and chemical traits (n=20) related to light harvesting, growth, propagation and defense (e.g. leaf mass per area, leaf area index, pigments nitrogen, phosphorus). The performance of our multi-trait CNN models predicting these traits was compared to single-trait CNNs as well as single-trait partial least squares regression (PLSR) models. The results of the multi-trait models across a broad range of vegetation types (crops, forest, tundra, grassland, shrubland) and sensor types were promising and outcompeted state-of-the-art PLSR models. We ...
|
|---|