Data_Sheet_1_Primary Productivity Dynamics in the Summer Arctic Ocean Confirms Broad Regulation of the Electron Requirement for Carbon Fixation by Light-Phytoplankton Community Interaction.docx

• Main Authors: Yuanli Zhu, David J. Suggett, Chenggang Liu, Jianfeng He, Longshan Lin, Fengfeng Le, Joji Ishizaka, Joaquim Goes, Qiang Hao
• Format: Dataset
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2019
• Subjects: Oceanography; Marine Biology; Marine Geoscience; Biological Oceanography; Chemical Oceanography; Physical Oceanography; Marine Engineering; primary productivity; Arctic Ocean; ice free/cover; electron requirement for carbon fixation; phytoplankton community; FRRf; Arctic; Phytoplankton; ice covered waters
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00275.s001; https://figshare.com/articles/Data_Sheet_1_Primary_Productivity_Dynamics_in_the_Summer_Arctic_Ocean_Confirms_Broad_Regulation_of_the_Electron_Requirement_for_Carbon_Fixation_by_Light-Phytoplankton_Community_Interaction_docx/8197667

Predicting conversion of photosynthetic electron transport to inorganic carbon uptake rates (the so-called electron requirement for carbon fixation, K C ) is central to the broad scale deployment of Fast Repetition Rate fluorometry (FRRf) for primary productivity studies. However, reconciling variability of K C over space and time to produce robust algorithms remains challenging, given the large number of factors that influence K C . We have previously shown that light appears to be a proximal driver of Kc in several ocean regions and we therefore examined whether and how light similarly regulated K C variability in the Arctic Ocean, during a summer cruise in 2016. Sampling transited ice-free and ice-covered waters, with temperature, salinity and Chl-a concentrations all higher for the ice-free than ice covered surface waters. Micro- and pico-phytoplankton generally dominated the ice-free and ice-covered waters, respectively. Values of K C , determined from parallel measures of daily integrated electron transport rates and 14 C-uptake, were overall lower for the ice-covered vs. ice-free stations. As in our previous studies, K C was strongly linearly correlated to daily PAR (r = 0.68, n = 46, p < 0.001) and this relationship could be further improved (r = 0.84, n = 46, p < 0.001) by separating samples into ice-free (micro-phytoplankton dominated) vs. ice-covered (Nano- and Pico-phytoplankton dominated water. We subsequently contrasted the PAR-K C relationship form the Arctic waters with the previous relationships from the Ariake Bay and East China Sea and revealed that these various PAR-K C relationships can be systematically explained across regions by phytoplankton community size structures. Specifically, the value of the linear slope describing PAR-K C decreases as water bodies have an increasing fraction of larger phytoplankton. We propose that this synoptic trend reflects how phytoplankton community structure integrates past and immediate environmental histories and hence may be a better broad-scale ...