| Summary: | Despite being one of the oldest activities carried out by man and having an enormous socioeconomic importance for Brazil, fishing industry, mainly the small-scale fisheries, is still quite neglected from national political processes. Following the country's agro-export vein, the federal government's growing orientation towards increasing production through aquaculture and industrial fishing seems to be an incompatible strategy, both with the characteristics of the natural reproductive forces of the South Atlantic Ocean (in which the brazilian coast is situated) and with the social reality of the fisheries sector, which employs almost 1 million workers (more than 90% working in small-scale fisheries). The disorderly institutionalization of a national plan for the fishing industry is reflected in the other federative entities. As an economic activity, of an extractive nature, and carried out in public domain territory, marine capture fisheries are pressured (i) economically - by competition with industrial fisheries; and (ii) territorially - by other economic activities at sea, by the impacts of increasing coastal urbanization and by the rules and laws imposed by environmental conservation agencies, at different levels of the federation. Recent, but scarce, studies seek to understand, punctually, the effects of certain public policies, or comanagement systems, with a view from the territory where the activity occurs. However, it is understood that looking at the development of small-scale fisheries should also consider the economic, environmental and social dimensions, but mainly incorporate a better understanding of the forces acting in the local context. In order to contribute to this discussion, and incorporating the political dimension, the research question that guided this dissertation was: How the processes of interaction between different social groups (government and civil society), in a local context, influence the development of small-scale fisheries? In order to answer it, a bibliographical review was ...
|
|---|