«Herrer i eget hus» – Finnmarksloven i media

Abstract In 2005, the Norwegian Parliament passed the Finnmark Act, with ownership of 96 % of Finnmark transferred from the State to the inhabitants of Finnmark. This article discusses the dominant arguments for and against the Act in two local newspapers in Finnmark. The debate was intense. Would t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Norsk medietidsskrift
Main Author: Stine Sand Eira
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Norwegian Bokmål
Norwegian Nynorsk
Published: Universitetsforlaget 2013
Subjects:
Indigenous rights
the Finnmark Act
Sámi
media
Indigenousrights
theFinnmarkAct
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Finnmark
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN0805-9535-2013-04-04
https://doaj.org/article/ff7d240575904211864b0a5470604711
Description
Summary:Abstract In 2005, the Norwegian Parliament passed the Finnmark Act, with ownership of 96 % of Finnmark transferred from the State to the inhabitants of Finnmark. This article discusses the dominant arguments for and against the Act in two local newspapers in Finnmark. The debate was intense. Would the Finnmark Act lead to private ownership based on ethnicity, or equal ownership? Different understandings of equity, justice and ethnicity were used rhetorically by those against the law and also by those who were positive. Fear of privatization was a dominant argument based on a democratic view where no one should have private ownership.

Similar Items