3D model of Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen and Karelia Craton based on geology, reflection seismics, magnetotellurics and density modelling: Geodynamic speculations

A 3D model of deep crustal structure of the Archaean Karelia Craton and late Palaeoproterozoic Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen including the boundary zone is presented. The model is based on the combination of data from geological mapping and reflection seismic studies, along profiles 1-EU, 4B, FIR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geoscience Frontiers
Main Authors: Michael V. Mints, Victor N. Glaznev, Olga M. Muravina, Elena Yu Sokolova
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.003
https://doaj.org/article/fd61f9daf7944e78991f752d0e7bf230
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:fd61f9daf7944e78991f752d0e7bf230
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:fd61f9daf7944e78991f752d0e7bf230 2023-10-09T21:53:07+02:00 3D model of Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen and Karelia Craton based on geology, reflection seismics, magnetotellurics and density modelling: Geodynamic speculations Michael V. Mints Victor N. Glaznev Olga M. Muravina Elena Yu Sokolova 2020-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.003 https://doaj.org/article/fd61f9daf7944e78991f752d0e7bf230 EN eng Elsevier http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987119301975 https://doaj.org/toc/1674-9871 1674-9871 doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.003 https://doaj.org/article/fd61f9daf7944e78991f752d0e7bf230 Geoscience Frontiers, Vol 11, Iss 3, Pp 999-1023 (2020) Geology QE1-996.5 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.003 2023-09-10T00:50:54Z A 3D model of deep crustal structure of the Archaean Karelia Craton and late Palaeoproterozoic Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen including the boundary zone is presented. The model is based on the combination of data from geological mapping and reflection seismic studies, along profiles 1-EU, 4B, FIRE-1-2a-2 and FIRE-3-3a, and uses results of magnetotelluric soundings in southern Finland and northern Karelia. A seismogeological model of the crust and crust–mantle boundary is compared with a model of subhorizontal velocity-density layering of the crust. The TTG-type crust of the Palaeoarchaean and Mesoarchaean microcontinents within the Karelia Craton and the Belomorian Province are separated by gently dipping greenstone belts, at least some of which are palaeosutures. The structure of the crust was determined mainly by Palaeoproterozoic tectonism in the intra-continental settings modified by a strong collisional compression at the end of the Palaeoproterozoic. New insights into structure, origin and evolution of the Svecofennian Orogen are provided. The accretionary complex is characterized by inclined tectonic layering: the tectonic sheets, ~15 km thick, are composed of volcanic-sedimentary rocks, including electro-conductive graphite-bearing sedimentary rocks, and electro-resistive granitoids, which plunge monotonously and consecutively eastward. Upon reaching the level of the lower crust, the tectonic sheets of the accretionary complex lose their distinct outlines. In the seismic reflection pattern they are replaced by a uniform acoustically translucent medium, where separate sheets can only be traced fragmentarily. The crust–mantle boundary bears a diffuse character: the transition from crust to mantle is recorded by the disappearance of the vaguely drawn boundaries of the tectonic sheets and in the gradual transition of acoustically homogeneous and translucent lower crust into transparent mantle. Under the effect of endogenic heat flow, the accretionary complex underwent high-temperature metamorphism and ... Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geoscience Frontiers 11 3 999 1023
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Geology
QE1-996.5
Michael V. Mints
Victor N. Glaznev
Olga M. Muravina
Elena Yu Sokolova
3D model of Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen and Karelia Craton based on geology, reflection seismics, magnetotellurics and density modelling: Geodynamic speculations
topic_facet Geology
QE1-996.5
description A 3D model of deep crustal structure of the Archaean Karelia Craton and late Palaeoproterozoic Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen including the boundary zone is presented. The model is based on the combination of data from geological mapping and reflection seismic studies, along profiles 1-EU, 4B, FIRE-1-2a-2 and FIRE-3-3a, and uses results of magnetotelluric soundings in southern Finland and northern Karelia. A seismogeological model of the crust and crust–mantle boundary is compared with a model of subhorizontal velocity-density layering of the crust. The TTG-type crust of the Palaeoarchaean and Mesoarchaean microcontinents within the Karelia Craton and the Belomorian Province are separated by gently dipping greenstone belts, at least some of which are palaeosutures. The structure of the crust was determined mainly by Palaeoproterozoic tectonism in the intra-continental settings modified by a strong collisional compression at the end of the Palaeoproterozoic. New insights into structure, origin and evolution of the Svecofennian Orogen are provided. The accretionary complex is characterized by inclined tectonic layering: the tectonic sheets, ~15 km thick, are composed of volcanic-sedimentary rocks, including electro-conductive graphite-bearing sedimentary rocks, and electro-resistive granitoids, which plunge monotonously and consecutively eastward. Upon reaching the level of the lower crust, the tectonic sheets of the accretionary complex lose their distinct outlines. In the seismic reflection pattern they are replaced by a uniform acoustically translucent medium, where separate sheets can only be traced fragmentarily. The crust–mantle boundary bears a diffuse character: the transition from crust to mantle is recorded by the disappearance of the vaguely drawn boundaries of the tectonic sheets and in the gradual transition of acoustically homogeneous and translucent lower crust into transparent mantle. Under the effect of endogenic heat flow, the accretionary complex underwent high-temperature metamorphism and ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Michael V. Mints
Victor N. Glaznev
Olga M. Muravina
Elena Yu Sokolova
author_facet Michael V. Mints
Victor N. Glaznev
Olga M. Muravina
Elena Yu Sokolova
author_sort Michael V. Mints
title 3D model of Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen and Karelia Craton based on geology, reflection seismics, magnetotellurics and density modelling: Geodynamic speculations
title_short 3D model of Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen and Karelia Craton based on geology, reflection seismics, magnetotellurics and density modelling: Geodynamic speculations
title_full 3D model of Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen and Karelia Craton based on geology, reflection seismics, magnetotellurics and density modelling: Geodynamic speculations
title_fullStr 3D model of Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen and Karelia Craton based on geology, reflection seismics, magnetotellurics and density modelling: Geodynamic speculations
title_full_unstemmed 3D model of Svecofennian Accretionary Orogen and Karelia Craton based on geology, reflection seismics, magnetotellurics and density modelling: Geodynamic speculations
title_sort 3d model of svecofennian accretionary orogen and karelia craton based on geology, reflection seismics, magnetotellurics and density modelling: geodynamic speculations
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.003
https://doaj.org/article/fd61f9daf7944e78991f752d0e7bf230
genre karelia*
genre_facet karelia*
op_source Geoscience Frontiers, Vol 11, Iss 3, Pp 999-1023 (2020)
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987119301975
https://doaj.org/toc/1674-9871
1674-9871
doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.003
https://doaj.org/article/fd61f9daf7944e78991f752d0e7bf230
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.003
container_title Geoscience Frontiers
container_volume 11
container_issue 3
container_start_page 999
op_container_end_page 1023
_version_ 1779316354214526976