Health care provider practices in diagnosis and treatment of malaria in rural communities in Kisumu County, Kenya

Abstract Background Accurate malaria diagnosis and appropriate treatment at local health facilities are critical to reducing morbidity and human reservoir of infectious gametocytes. The current study assessed the accuracy of malaria diagnosis and treatment practices in three health care facilities i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malaria Journal
Main Authors: Wilfred Ouma Otambo, Julius O. Olumeh, Kevin O. Ochwedo, Edwin O. Magomere, Isaiah Debrah, Collins Ouma, Patrick Onyango, Harrysone Atieli, Wolfgang R. Mukabana, Chloe Wang, Ming-Chieh Lee, Andrew K. Githeko, Guofa Zhou, John Githure, James Kazura, Guiyun Yan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04156-z
https://doaj.org/article/fbf0b7c7263749aca07b6be3ef8683fc
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Accurate malaria diagnosis and appropriate treatment at local health facilities are critical to reducing morbidity and human reservoir of infectious gametocytes. The current study assessed the accuracy of malaria diagnosis and treatment practices in three health care facilities in rural western Kenya. Methods The accuracy of malaria detection and treatment recommended compliance was monitored in two public and one private hospital from November 2019 through March 2020. Blood smears from febrile patients were examined by hospital laboratory technicians and re-examined by an expert microscopists thereafter subjected to real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for quality assurance. In addition, blood smears from patients diagnosed with malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and presumptively treated with anti-malarial were re-examined by an expert microscopist. Results A total of 1131 febrile outpatients were assessed for slide positivity (936), RDT (126) and presumptive diagnosis (69). The overall positivity rate for Plasmodium falciparum was 28% (257/936). The odds of slide positivity was higher in public hospitals, 30% (186/624, OR:1.44, 95% CI = 1.05–1.98, p < 0.05) than the private hospital 23% (71/312, OR:0.69, 95% CI = 0.51–0.95, p < 0.05). Anti-malarial treatment was dispensed more at public hospitals (95.2%, 177/186) than the private hospital (78.9%, 56/71, p < 0.0001). Inappropriate anti-malarial treatment, i.e. artemether-lumefantrine given to blood smear negative patients was higher at public hospitals (14.6%, 64/438) than the private hospital (7.1%, 17/241) (p = 0.004). RDT was the most sensitive (73.8%, 95% CI = 39.5–57.4) and specific (89.2%, 95% CI = 78.5–95.2) followed by hospital microscopy (sensitivity 47.6%, 95% CI = 38.2–57.1) and specificity (86.7%, 95% CI = 80.8–91.0). Presumptive diagnosis had the lowest sensitivity (25.7%, 95% CI = 13.1–43.6) and specificity (75.0%, 95% CI = 50.6–90.4). RDT had the highest non-treatment of negatives [98.3% (57/58)] while ...