Do we need to go further to train healthcare providers in the targeted regions for malaria elimination in Myanmar? A mixed-methods study

• Published in: Tropical Medicine and Health
• Main Authors: Zar Ni Min Hein, Thae Maung Maung, Poe Poe Aung, Nwe Oo Mon, Wai Wai Han, Tin Oo, Nay Yi Yi Linn, Aung Thi, Khin Thet Wai
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2020
• Subjects: Malaria elimination; Training; Health staff; Myanmar; SORT IT; Knowledge; Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine; RC955-962; Arctic
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00196-w; https://doaj.org/article/f30d341185c04e349115b7a408909ab1

Abstract Background The National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) in Myanmar trained health staff at the township level starting in mid-2016 in order to achieve the Plasmodium falciparum malaria elimination target by 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and perception of Basic Health Staff (BHS) and Vector-borne Diseases Control (VBDC) teams exposed to a short training course on malaria elimination in six targeted townships which included two conflict-affected townships between 2016 and 2017. Methods This was a cross-sectional mixed-methods study using quantitative and qualitative data extracted from one survey database conducted between October 2018 and March 2019. Modified Poisson regression analysis was performed to ascertain the determinants of low knowledge scores after the training programme. Results Altogether, 544 trained frontline health workers involved in malaria elimination at the time of the survey were recruited and 56% (302/544) were stationed at sub-Rural Health Centers. More than half of the respondents had correct knowledge of malaria case categories although relapse and recrudescent cases (39% and 37% respectively) were less well known. Over two-thirds of respondents could mention those eligible for malaria testing. Less than 30% knew the foci classification. The overall knowledge scores ranged from 10 to 31. The significant predictors of low level of knowledge [the cut-off point was set at the median value of 21 (IQR 12–30)] in multivariate analysis were the younger age group (18–29 years) and health staff who had attended malaria elimination training in 2017, [(APR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.2–2.2)]; and (APR = 1.5, 95%CI 1.2–1.8)]. Qualitative data from 10 key informants identified perceived challenges in conflict-affected areas as well as in areas of high population mobility with further implications for case surveillance. In addition, the low level of education of community members was noted as one of the barriers that hampered public readiness in the elimination scenario. Conclusion A ...