Intercomparison of CO measurements from TROPOMI, ACE-FTS, and a high-Arctic ground-based Fourier transform spectrometer

The TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) provides a daily, spatially resolved (initially 7×7 km 2 , upgraded to 7×5.6 km 2 in August 2019) global dataset of CO columns; however, due to the relative sparseness of reliable ground-based data sources, it can be challenging to characterize the va...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Main Authors: T. Wizenberg, K. Strong, K. Walker, E. Lutsch, T. Borsdorff, J. Landgraf
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7707-2021
https://doaj.org/article/ed53f23655d24b5994043c55dac99b39
Description
Summary:The TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) provides a daily, spatially resolved (initially 7×7 km 2 , upgraded to 7×5.6 km 2 in August 2019) global dataset of CO columns; however, due to the relative sparseness of reliable ground-based data sources, it can be challenging to characterize the validity and accuracy of satellite data products in remote regions such as the high Arctic. In these regions, satellite intercomparisons can supplement model- and ground-based validation efforts and serve to verify previously observed differences. In this paper, we compare the CO products from TROPOMI, the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE) Fourier transform spectrometer (FTS), and a high-Arctic ground-based FTS located at the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL) in Eureka, Nunavut (80.05 ∘ N, 86.42 ∘ W). A global comparison of TROPOMI reference profiles scaled by the retrieved total column with ACE-FTS CO partial columns for the period from 28 November 2017 to 31 May 2020 displays excellent agreement between the two datasets ( R =0.93 ) and a small relative bias of <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M8" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mn><mo>±</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mn><mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mi mathvariant="italic">%</mi></mrow></math> <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="75pt" height="10pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="ec2fc91239eaea953aa270178bffcd62"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="amt-14-7707-2021-ie00001.svg" width="75pt" height="10pt" src="amt-14-7707-2021-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg> (bias ± standard error of the mean). Additional comparisons were performed within five latitude bands: the north polar region (60 to 90 ∘ N), northern mid-latitudes (20 to 60 ∘ N), the equatorial region (20 ∘ S to 20 ∘ ...