Policy Performance and Satisfaction with Democracy

In this paper we examine how subjective perception of government’s policy performance affects satisfaction with how democracy works in Iceland. This we base on the argument that the public is aware of and evaluating the governments’ performance when the political system is faced with a major crisis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration
Main Authors: Eva Heiða Önnudóttir, Ólafur Þ. Harðarson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Icelandic
Published: University of Iceland 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2011.7.2.11
https://doaj.org/article/eaca6cfcf4ed43c99c3b480550b1d0c5
Description
Summary:In this paper we examine how subjective perception of government’s policy performance affects satisfaction with how democracy works in Iceland. This we base on the argument that the public is aware of and evaluating the governments’ performance when the political system is faced with a major crisis that has been extensively publicly debated and triggered widespread protests. The financial and political crisis in Iceland 2008-09 provides an opportunity to examine if government performance can be seen as a causal factor explaining satisfaction with the democratic process. We take into account two alternative explanations; that satisfaction with how democracy works depends on citizens’ belief in how well the representative system works; and if they are more satisfied when their party is represented in government. Our principal conclusion is that subjective policy performance is the main explanation for citizens’ increased dissatisfaction with democracy during a severe crisis.